mr. cordova to do the work that he's done. that study is before us. i think the findings of the study are important. >> i'm happy to present on the status of the peer review and the tunnel option study update. let's start with the peer review where our mission was to go ahead and review and bring in a panel of experts to take a look at three operational studies that frankly had some different types of information that were used for those. in that regard, we've brought all the players together to take a look at that. the three in question are listed on your screen there. one prepared by a consultant to the properties and the properties they own at the second of corner and howard. also, the second was prepared by the operation analysis of two versus three tracks. and a third study prepared by the consultant team. the peer review panel that we assembled is led by ty lynn international. extraordinary in terms of the operations analysis experience. today we have actually you vein coropowski here today. he'll actually present in a minute or so. i just want

mr. cordova? if not, i will turn it back over to eric. thank you, gene. i look at my other screen. sorry. commissioner kim. >> thank you. i just had a couple of questions. this is my first briefing on this report. so the current train box which we have already built out for the terminal would accommodate either a two-or three-track tunnel? >> yes, that's true. >> so what we're mainly considering is either the alignment or both of what we do at the fourth and king rail yard; is that correct? >> it was looking at two or three tracks and the throat section that goes ahead and turns right into the train box. we have a lot of tunnelling. we're about to give another presentation on the tunnelling effort there in that regard. >> there was a cut and cover alignment study in the original eir. >> right. >> there was a question that came up about the tunnel boring machines of this size. is that possible? is that feasible? >> i would like to get into the presentation, commissioner kim, and we could go ahead and answer those questions. my apologies for not being clear. >> i will wait for the pr