mr. craddick to be able to answer a question before we leave. >> mr. calio, appreciate you being here today. both of the airlines pilots and federal flight officers have gone through a lot of different training in this industry. and i really think it is imperative that what you brought out in your written testimony that the aircrew flight attendants and pilots know who is on their aircraft. it is imperative, and i just echo that and i complement you one that. i have got just a couple of quick questions for you because unfortunately it will be appreciated. i am a strong promote -- opponent and i strongly agree with that but with that said, you are proposing additional training and some of the words you use our flight attendants must know how to respond to deadly force. is imperative national security. -- this rule is written right now, sir, what i have a very big contention with its additional training is proposed which prohibits any testing that allows any crewmember to opt out if they do not wish to physically participate, is that correct sir or am i

mr. craddick to be able to answer a question before we leave. >> mr. calio, appreciate you being here today. both of the airlines pilots and federal flight officers have gone through a lot of different training in this industry. and i really think it is imperative that what you brought out in your written testimony that the aircrew flight attendants and pilots know who is on their aircraft. it is imperative, and i just echo that and i complement you one that. i have got just a couple of quick questions for you because unfortunately it will be appreciated. i am a strong promote -- opponent and i strongly agree with that but with that said, you are proposing additional training and some of the words you use our flight attendants must know how to respond to deadly force. is imperative national security. -- this rule is written right now, sir, what i have a very big contention with its additional training is proposed which prohibits any testing that allows any crewmember to opt out if they do not wish to physically participate, is that correct sir or am i

mr. craddick to be able to answer a question before we leave. >> mr. calio, appreciate you being here today. both of the airlines pilots and federal flight officers have gone through a lot of different training in this industry. and i really think it is imperative that what you brought out in your written testimony that the aircrew flight attendants and pilots know who is on their aircraft. it is imperative, and i just echo that and i complement you one that. i have got just a couple of quick questions for you because unfortunately it will be appreciated. i am a strong promote -- opponent and i strongly agree with that but with that said, you are proposing additional training and some of the words you use our flight attendants must know how to respond to deadly force. is imperative national security. -- this rule is written right now, sir, what i have a very big contention with its additional training is proposed which prohibits any testing that allows any crewmember to opt out if they do not wish to physically participate, is that correct sir or am i