again, i'll add that into the -- >> mr. critz, i -- i also will contribute to adding more detail to the record, but it's absolutely a very long-term prospect and it's -- it's expected to be ten years-plus. if i could i want to -- while i've got the floor on this issue, thank the committee for its support of the task force on businesses and stabilities operations. that's $150 million this year of department of defense money that is going to help helping economic development in afghanistan. in close partnership with usid and looking at both long-term pross effects for example for minerals helping improve mo long-term and how to encourage them to move forward and how to bring in capital that will help them be sustainable over time. >> okay. well, talking about sustainality brings plea to my next question. as i noticed in the reporting that the ansf is going about a and p being 157. generally in your estimation or expert analysis, the growth and the development of non-commissioned officers within the nsf and the growth and expertise

. >> mr. critz. >> thank you, mr. chairman. dr. miller, general allen, thank you for being here, for your service. i missed the point, mr. turner asked about poppy growth. can you give me a specific as to how much less poppy growth there is going on in afghanistan now as compared to when it was at its peak? >> let me take that question, and i will get you a definitive answer on that, which gives you some of history and where we are today, and incorporates both or mr. turner and you a sense of what we think we will be going both in terms of afghan security force a government that supports counter-narcotics. >> can you tell me what has replace poppy growth in the places that we know it's been eradicated? >> there have been a number of crops, weed, pomegranate. what we would consider to be normal agricultural cash crops? >> i understand pomegranates, there's a lot of infrastructure needed to do. is the infrastructure in place? >> it will be a long-term development for them. >> meaning? >> years. >> five, 10? >> i can tell you. i will

mr. critz: thank you, mr. levin. thank you, madam speaker. as a co-sponsor of this bill, i rise in strong support of h.r. 4105. in 2011, the u.s. court of appeals ruled that the department of commerce did not have the authority to impose countervailing duties on goods from nonmarket economies. of the 24 countervailing duties currently in place against goods from nonmarket economies, 23 are from china. without the legislative action we are proposing today to overturn this ruling, it is very likely that these current countervailing duties will be negated. this is unacceptable and we can't stand by where over 80,000 manufacturing jobs are at stake. almost every state is impacted by this decision, and almost every congressional district in pennsylvania has companies that would be affected it if this legislation does not pass. we must take action today and pass h.r. 4105 to overturn a flawed court ruling and to ensure that the department of commerce can continue to fight unfair subsidies that hurt american manufacturers and american workers. we mu