mr. culberson has that position. mr. culberson: i do. mr. latourette: i know he does. he can have that position, but what you can't do, what you can't do is bring an amendment to the floor that present tends to do one thing and doesn't do another. if you don't want project labor agreements to do one thing, vote against mr. grimm's amendment. if you think they should be in the mix, then vote for it. mr. culberson: in right-to-work states where we have no labor unions, we don't want contractors to be required to adopt prevailing wages or adopt union guidelines in order to bid on the contract. in states like yours, ohio, new york, new jersey, you should be free to do so. and if i may, the way the amendment is written, we have a difference of opinion, but it is written very clearly that the government cannot require or prohibit contractors from adopting these p.l.a.'s. so it leaves it really up to the local v.a. to decide whether they're going to bid it out to a non-union shop or union shop, depending on the state. in your state, fine. in texas, you know, we are a non-unio