mr. cummings. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman. mr. geiger, the expectation of privacy, talk about that, certainly no court cases in light of the question comes down to what is expected of the person. i guess when you have drones it really broadens the expectation, is that right? it kind of throws, it just opens the door to all kinds of surveillance. do you follow what i'm saying? >> i do. i believe this is how courts will interpret that in the future. right now the supreme court has interpreted the regional expectation of privacy doctrine do not include aerial surveillance from the publicly navigable airspace. i can only imagine that regional expectation of privacy standard or in common law torts would count as highly offensive to raise will persevere i will only imagine that will shrink as more and more ues take to the sky. this is one reason why we are arguing that current federal law does not provide adequate privacprivacy protection to we d not just rely on common law or the fourth amendment, the ought to be something in federal l