mr. dalton. and it certainly expresses an opinion of mr. buel as to the participants and the panel, it does not suggest that there was going to be some official action or that they were asking the panel not to occur. and to me, this does fall into category four as the e-mail that did not need to be responded to. and that it meets the other requirements. and you know, all of that being said, i understand mr. wooding your frustration here. and i can see why you think that it feels like a cover up, because e-mails get deleted that are inflammatory and it is possible that it was deleted by the desire to prevent it from being disclosed. but as far as the law requires, and what he is required to maintain it does not appear to fit within a document for which retention was required. >> i don't know. my fellow commissioners. >> i guess the question that i have is i am not sure that issue is really raised. because when you read the sections that they claim were violated, 67.25, which is to satisfy an immediate request. there is no doubt that the resp

mr. dalton well, and so it was kind of a, or just a let me tell you what i am thinking and why. i should correct, also, i said that you had a communication with the city attorney it was actually from olive gong that had sightings and city attorney stuff in it and i think that it correct and i am not represented by council. >> do you and i know this is some time ago. but do you recall whether you would have looked in both your received and your sent locations for correspondence? >> you know, at that time, that was probably above my pay grade. i was operating on a blackberry at the time and i think that it was just one category that i knew to plug in to search for anything in e-mail and it would show up. i think both as sent and received. but i can't say that for as a fact. i have learned a lot more about it since. >> not advertising for blackberry. >> no. >> i'm on the iphone. >> okay. thank you. >> i actually have or wanted to bring mr. wo lf up here if you would not mind? >> bruce wolf. >> so mr. wolf, i hear your comments, and i think that i have, certainly my view of this is