mr. david kelly who was contracted, subcontracted visited the site on february 9 of 2011. his qualifications are not provided beyond the phrase he is a "qualified field technician." the statement does not describe the equipment mr. kelly used. the date it was last calibrated, the test procedures he performed or whether mr. kelly has received any training for this particular equipment. in fact, the statement lacks any of the work that he had done on this date. any measurements are dubious. there is a checklist in item number one describes mr. kelly doing measurements of the existing directional onsite in the site of the directionth antenna. some directions are meaningless. this positions vertically as it does now does not at all radiate strictly downward. as you can see on the figures 2 and 3. this is the field distribution on the directional antenna that is there now. mr. kelly standing underneath on the ground, presumably, he cannot fly so he is measuring nothing because there is nothing. so stating that the measurements show that there is only one field of the f.c.c. lim