mr. denniston. um-hmm. you hear miss fanning. listening to miss fanning, i think that she has approached the problem responsibly. listing to mr. dniston, his comment was that like a kid with a story-- the way he put it was, ou have no idea what the feelinis like." i'm not interested in what the feeling of the reporter is like. i'm inteed in what effect it'll have on the political system and what t publisher believes is the right of the public to know and the responsibility of the press transfer that infortion to the public. i'm not interested that after 39 years he might get a pulitzer prize. if that's what he's looking for, i think it's unethical. if what he's loong for is to sell his pars, i think that that's unethical if that's the sole goal. if the goais to inform so tt the voting public can make a decision about a leader in this country, then tnk it's an ok eld to go into. i think that's the point that was brought up. t criteria isn't relevant, what's the answer when it comes to the deep private lives of candidates? current a