[applause] we will now hear from mr. dihn. >> thank you, your honor. may it please the court, my name is mr. dihn, as my colonial masters would have it. [laughter] the first thing we do -- let's kill all the prisoners. response to a v's mistaken fear that the french forces had reinforced their ranks. that was also his angry response to the news that servants and pages had been killed and his luggage had been stolen. [laughter] neither is legally sufficient to justify henry's slaughter of the prisoners. thank you, just michel. henry's order must be seen for what is -- a criminal act of laws of war and offends any notion of chivalry of humanity -- or humanity. william shakespeare offers two reasons. one is reprisal. legal actder was a in response to the killing of the pages. this fails as a matter of fact. as you recall, the order to kill was given a in scene -- given in scene 6 and henry did not know about those killings until scene 7. it is legally unjustified and a logical. -- and illogical. the court beeow held that no noncombatants were killed unlaw