mr. dingell. [applause] -- let me now call on mr. dingell. [applause] >> i am now ready to take the oath of office. i asked the honorable john dingell of michigan to administer the oath of office. >> will the gentleman from georgia please raise his right hand? do you solemnly swear you will defend and support the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. >> congratulations, mr. speaker. [applause] >> in 1999 incoming speaker dennis hastert allowed c-span2 follow him around. tell us his reputation among his republican colleagues? what made him an attractive

mr. dingell.the speaker: i am now ready to take the oath of office and i ask the dean of the house of representatives the honorable john dingell of michigan to administer the oath of office. >> will the gentleman from georgia please raise his right hand. do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter so help you god? the speaker: i do. mr. dingell: congratulations.

mr. dingell, and in acknowledging him, i also want to acknowledge speaker foley who has been with us as well. [applause] >> the distinguished gentlewoman from california will please raise your right hand. do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, and that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and that you take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will faithfully and well discharge the duties of the office upon which you are about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. [cheers and applause] >> you're watching american history tv, all weekend, every weekend on c-span3. to join the conversation, like us on facebook at c-span history. >> the 114th congress gavels in this tuesday at noon eastern. watch live coverage of the house on c-span and the senate live on c-span2, and track the gop-led congress and have your say as events unfold on the c-span networks, c-span radio. new congress, best access on c-span. >> the c-span city stewart takes

mr. dingell.e speaker: i am now ready to take the oath of office and i ask the dean of the house of representatives the honorable john dingell of michigan to administer the oath of office. >> will the gentleman from georgia please raise his right hand. do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter so help you god? the speaker: i do. mr. dingell: congratulations.

mr. dingell. [applause] >> i am now ready to take the oath of office.sked the honorable john dingell of michigan to administer the oath of office. >> will the gentleman from georgia please raise his right hand? do you solemnly swear you will defend and support the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office of which you are about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. >> congratulations, mr. speaker. [applause] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2014] >> in 1999, incoming speaker dennis hastert allowed c-span to follow him around. we will see that footage in a few minutes. but first, could you tell us his reputation among his republican colleagues. what mad

mr. dingell. [applause] my friend, my colleague from the commerce committee whose common sense and fairness i admire. he will administer the oath of office. >> thank you, mr. speaker. if the gentleman from illinois will please raise his right hand. do you solemnly swear to support the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, and that you will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office which you are about to -- about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. [applause] >> according to the president, the chair will swear in and all members of the house at this time. if the members will rise, the chair will administer the oath of office. all members please raise your right hands. do you solemnly swear you will support and defend the constitution of the united states, against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that

mr. dingell. [applause] the speaker: i am now ready to take the oath of office i am now ready to take the oath of office i ask the honorable john dingell of michigan to administer the oath of office. >> >> will the gentleman from georgia please raise his right hand. do you solemnly swear to defend and support the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic that you will bear true allean gs to the same that you take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the of

mr. dingell. the sporting we are joined by represents of the department of state, treasury and from homeland today. ambassador sung kim is the special representative for the north korea policy and the deputy assistant secretary for korea and japan. previously he served as u.s. ambassador to the republic of korea and he was the special envoy for the six-party talks. honorable daniel glaser, prior to his his confirmation, assistant secretary starr terrorist finance in the office of terrorism and financial intelligence at department of treasury. he served as the first director of the treasury's executive office of terrorist financing and financial crimes. brigadier general gregory touhill is deputy assistant secretary for cyber city operations, programs at the department program security. previously he served in united states air force as the chief information officer and director of command, control, to communications and cyber systems at u.s. transportation command. and so without objection, the br

mrs. dingell. mrs.ingell:judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and bedisqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the united states, but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial judgment, and punishment, according to law. mr. goodlatte: i now yield to the gentleman from pennsylvania mr. marino. mr. marino: thank you, chairman. section 4 the times, places, and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof, but the congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations except as to the places of choosing senators. mr. goodlatte: i now yield to the gentlewoman from ohio, ms. joyce beatty. mrs. beatty:each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to

mr. dingell did in the essence of time i have a couple yes and no questions but really would be helpful. do you agree with ms. baker got mobile wouldn't be covered under the existing authority when it comes to a playing of these new net neutrality standards? >> turn on the microphone there. >> bbb they could reach wireless by classifying the broadband. >> you think they could get there even though it has a different view? >> i'm not an attorney. >> that makes two of us. >> the most important thing there is no difference between mobile and broadband. >> so you want them both covered. >> i agree with the chairman's assessment. i also agree that consumers view these interchangeably and it should be the same policy for both. >> so you think it is sustainable. >> i'm not an attorney but we think that the title number two with stifled the expansion of mobile so we think that is a bad idea. >> .. >> >> we found the fcc process so far to be quite open switch is quite possible. >> no. >> i am not sure if we would see it. probably not. >> no. >> to a former commissioners and they said very unlikel

mr. dingell.nce of time, i've got a couple of yes and no questions that would be helpful. and i'd start and work down. yes or no, do you agree with ms. baker that mobile would not be covered under the fcc's existing authority when it comes to applying these new net neutrality standards. mr. powell? turn on the microphone there. >> we believe that the fcc could reach wireless by reclassifying as much as they're proposing to do with respect to fix broadband. >> uh you think they could get there? >> not without risk. but we do believe they -- >> all right. mr. dickerson? >> i'm not an attorney. >> that's two of us. i stayed in a -- >> i think the most important thing for us there's no difference between mobile and broadband. >> you want them both covered? >> yes. >> i agree with chairman powell's assessment. legal assessment. i also agree that consumers view these interchangeably. >> you think it's legally sustainable? ms. gonzalez? >> it's legally sustainable. >> all right. >> i'm not an attorney, i

mr. dingell but in the essence of time i got a couple of yes and no questions that really would be helpful. i start, mr. powell, work down. yes or no, do you agree with ms. baker that mobile would not be covered under the f.c.c.'s existing authority when it comes to applying these new net neutrality standards? mr. powell? turn on the microphone there. >> we believe that the f.c.c. could reach wireless by reclassifying much as they are proposing to do with respect to fixed broadband. >> you think they could get there even though 332. >> not without risk. we do believe -- >> mr. dickerson? >> i'm not an attorney. >> that's two of us. i stayed at a holiday in-n. >> the most important thing for us in our minds there is no difference between mobile and broadband. >> you want them both covered? >> and any -- >> ok. mr. misener? >> i agree with chairman powell's assessment. legal assessment. i also agree that consumers view these interchangeably and should be the same policy for both. >> you think it's legally sustainable. ms. gonzalez. >> i agree it's legal and sustainable. >> ms. turner-lee? >>

mr. dingell did in the essence of time i have a couple yes and no questions but really would be helpful. do you agree with ms. baker that mobile wouldn't be covered under the existing authority when it comes to these new net neutrality standards? >> turn on the microphone there. >> we believe the fcc could reach wireless by classifying the broadband. >> you think they could get there even though it has a different view? >> i'm not an attorney. >> that makes two of us. >> the most important thing there is no difference between mobile and broadband. >> so you want them both covered? >> i agree with the chairman's assessment. i also agree that consumers view these interchangeably and it should be the same policy for both. >> so you think it is sustainable? >> it is sustainable. >> i'm not an attorney but we think that the title number two would stifle the expansion of mobile so we think that is a bad idea. >> we found the fcc process so far to be quite open switch is quite possible. >> there is division. yes or no have you actually seen what to the fcc is proposing? >> >> no. >> we have see

mrs. dingell. mrs. dingell:judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and bedisqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the united states, but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial judgment, and punishment, according to law. mr. goodlatte: i now yield to the gentleman from pennsylvania mr. marino. mr. marino: thank you, chairman. section 4 the times, places, and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof, but the congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations except as to the places of choosing senators. mr. goodlatte: i now yield to the gentlewoman from ohio, ms. joyce beatty. mrs. beatty:each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day

dingell: thank you, mr. speaker. i rise regarding fast track authorization this afternoon. there are many reasons to oppose fast track but the first and foremost is that fast track is an abdication of congress' fundamental responsibility. the constitution authorized the congress, not the executive branch, to regulate commerce between nations. this deal was negotiated by the administration in secret, without proper input or oversight from the congress. the grapevine tells us because they're not talking to us directly, that it will do nothing to address currency manipulation, the mother of all trade barriers. just one consequence is an $8,000 cost advantage to a japanese vehicle sold in the united states which is then used to subsidize parts, advertising or uh undercut the cost of a vehicle in the marketplace. in fact detroit made more in profits last year from currency manipulation than ford made last year in its entire worldwide operation. but i know about the domestic -- what i know about the domestic auto industry is they can out-compete any of their competitors in the wo

mr. dingell: congratulations.

mr. dingell: congratulations. >> in 1999, incoming speaker dennis hastert allowed c-span to follow him around on his first day in office. we will see that footage in a few moments, along with his opening-day remarks. first, what was his political reputation among his republican colleagues? what made him an attractive candidate to be speaker? >> dennis hastert came in with the gingrich revolution, and some of the problems that caused new to exit so quickly in 1999. there was a lot of healing that needed to be done. hastert was someone who was well-liked by the republicans. he had been in congress 12 years. he was a wrestling coach, an affable man. you had to be a strong partisan no question about that. but he was well-liked by his colleagues. at that point, with the house in turmoil, they looked to someone that had balance, that looked like a regular guy. dennis hastert was that. he represented a district west of chicago, in illinois. he is from aurora, illinois. he had a very nice counterpoint to newt gingrich's revolutionary style. >> what kind of the speaker did he turn out to be? >> he tur