mr. doggett: thank you, mr. speaker. i would be prepared to yield back, thanking chairman ryan as well as chairman upton and ranking member frank pallone who marked up this bill, and urge our bipartisan approval of it. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentlem from wisconsin. mr. ryan: at this time i'd like to also urge our colleagues to support this bill and i would yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass senate 139. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, 2/3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and, without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the able. for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h.r. 359 4. the speaker pro tempore: the

mr. doggett. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. doggett: as the last speech indicates, it is hardly by chance that the house republican leadership has scheduled these votes on 9/11. votes on a proposal, an agreement, to prevent iran from developing a nuclear weapon ever. the justifiable fear of another terrorist attack and the justifiable outrage about the terrorist attack of 9/11 have been exploited before today. they were exploited to justify the disastrous invasion of iraq. while few americans today will recall that actually after 9/11, there was some early support in iran against al qaeda terrorism, few can forget the of the repeated and rather deceitful warning that promoted the rush to war in iraq. we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. nce again, the specter of this mushroom cloud is being raised with those who would interfere with an international diplomatic success. an agreement that would avoid putting us on another path to war. and the same kind of folks that urged us to rush into baghdad are the same folks

mr. doggett. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. doggett: as the last speech indicates, it is hardly by chance that the house republican leadership has scheduled these votes on 9/11. votes on a proposal, an agreement, to prevent iran from developing a nuclear weapon ever. the justifiable fear of another terrorist attack and the justifiable outrage about the terrorist attack of 9/11 have been exploited before today. they were exploited to justify the disastrous invasion of iraq. while few americans today will recall that actually after 9/11, there was some early support in iran against al qaeda terrorism, few can forget the of the repeated and rather deceitful warning that promoted the rush to war in iraq. we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. nce again, the specter of this mushroom cloud is being raised with those who would interfere with an international diplomatic success. an agreement that would avoid putting us on another path to war. and the same kind of folks that urged us to rush into baghdad are the same folks

mr. doggett: the "national review" announced a suicide pact. 24e conservative caucus founder derided our president as a useful idiot and a weak man. sharp words for a president negotiate agnew clear agreement with an untrustworthy, terrorist-promote regular jet stream bent on destroying america. these these shrill republican attacks were against president ronald reagan for agreing with the soviets to limit nuclear missiles. while the bomb first rejectionist crowd, what they lack in understanding and creativity, they make up for here today in fatal consistency. those who think the only good deal with iran is a dead deal over nuclear weapons are only in danger -- are only endangering our families this week, i believe reason will prevail and the president will sustained. our families will be all the safer for it. and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> i ask to be recognized for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, mr. speaker.

mr. doggett. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. doggett: as the last speech indicates, it is hardly by chance that the house republican leadership has scheduled these votes on 9/11. votes on a proposal, an agreement, to prevent iran from developing a nuclear weapon ever. the justifiable fear of another terrorist attack and the justifiable outrage about the terrorist attack of 9/11 have been exploited before today. they were exploited to justify the disastrous invasion of iraq. while few americans today will recall that actually after 9/11, there was some early support in iran against al qaeda terrorism, few can forget the of the repeated and rather deceitful warning that promoted the rush to war in iraq. we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. nce again, the specter of this mushroom cloud is being raised with those who would interfere with an international diplomatic success. an agreement that would avoid putting us on another path to war. and the same kind of folks that urged us to rush into baghdad are the same folks

mr. doggett. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized for three minutes. every gett: almost observer, even the host of seeking the re republican presidential nomination says that iraq was a foreign policy disaster for which so many military families are continuing to pay a high price and american taxpayers will ultimately pay over a trillion dollars for that failure spurred on by some of the speeches like the one we just heard. and so we look next door to baghdad at tehran and we see a despicable government there, just as there was one in baghdad. we have ample intelligence evidence that that despicable government was pursuing a nuclear weapon program that is unacceptable to us, and we try to learn, is there a way for america to use its other power, its diplomatic power, to stop that because we know our use of military power did not accomplish positive forpe policy objectives by itself in -- foreign policy objectives by itself in a go it alone approach. we had an approach that had a strong bipartisan approach and that is to impose strong economic sanctions