mr. domenici was chairman and bill hogan was the deputy and it hurt us to have to write that language. that was the first time that we had sequester as far as i know, as a legal term in the budget lexicon. i didn't approve of it then. i don't approve of it now. i don't think congress needs it coming down because it can't do its work. we give them, and i've been in 11 campaigns in addition to doing more on budgets. we elect them for a reason, we elect them to vote and we elect them to get things done, and when someone says and is willing to say publicly as united states senator or united states congressman, we can't do this, we need something to force us to do this or to do it for us and then you know something really important has gone wrong. our report is very simple. we have jim jones that used to be nsa director, pete dom nichy and dan glickman who was the chairman of the house intel committee. the white paper says three things. one, it's stupid fiscal policy. two, it's stupid defense policy. three, it's stupid economic policy. why? >> if the sequester goes through both on defense a