mr. duffey. >> joe duffey i wanted to conform the permits h have been reinstated on december 9th the permit services and so there's nothing to appeal. >> okay well in that case. >> good solution anything to add any public comment on that item on those two items okay. so those items are withdrawn we can move on think to the next item item 6 versus the department of public health property on 1963 sutter street for a retail restaurant rewarding novice from equipment f this matter was on calendar november 19th and the board voted 4 to zero to overrule it didn't conform to the noise ordinances. >> great. >> so sir if you want to wait a moment did you see her. >> yes. she's right here. >> okay. fine. >> do you care to pour user some water and settle in a minute we called item 6. >> okay. are you okay. >> we can start. >> to the appellant you'll have 3 minutes. >> good evening i as directed by the board we've reached it out to rooster tail at that negotiate a settlement they said they'd get back to us on december 9th i agree with the draft understanding and didn't submit a brief, however in light

mr. duffey. >> commissioners, thank you for having me here i want to note at 5 o'clock we'll be vice chair our homeless folks that died on the streets program we're talking a life or death situation there are $6,000 plus homeless individuals if san francisco 34 hundred living on the street 18 in street programs and jail have no 0 home to be real estate department 20 to 10 years ago when mayor newsom had an effort this followed up open the adaptation by the voters when commissioner antonini and myself are here to support to bring about fundamental change in homelessness in 2005 we had 15 hundred shelter beds now 1145 part of that for the recommendation was a commitment to build 3 thousand new units of housing we realize that shelters plays an important role it is about individuals not getting $400 a month but $579 a month it is difficult in the housing market we're not moving people as quicken it is taking 6 to 9 months in the can't cash program to move into permanent housing i want to assure you the mayor i understand to do big intentions starting next year that has an impact on the street

mr. duffy. >> commissioners joe duffey again dbi that's a very good question i anticipated that will be an issue should the release of that suspension be upheld by the board i believe that probably both sides one side is going to work and the other side not let them work our notice of violation said stop all work that revision permit is the permit that everyone is talking about it's has not been approved or issued we do in situation get into conversations some days there are a limited scope of work and the gentleman won't like it the footage we stop work orders but continue something not associated with an issue we'll let the limited scope of work i don't know if that is going to happen i anticipate that will be a decision happening with the day by day in the next couple of weeks i want to clarify the comments about bringing no engineers before permits are issued so they can scrutinize the plans i'm familiar with that ever happening i would courage the permit holder to contact the plan check management and found out if that's allowed i'm not sorry. >> there was a comment about the gentleman bein

mr. duffy anything further. >> commissioners joe duffey dbi again i don't have too much to add one thing if this hadn't been appealed and we dealt with the complaints from the lady we in all likelihood this permit would have been suspended we would have said hey your plans are not showing you properly what our doing i which is looking at the plans there's no existing sections to show where the angle window is not scared off this triggers something i imagine that is something even though it's small they'd consider is additional square feet so i think we'd stop them and say hey, get a proper set of plans and employ for your permit you have to go drove the process that would be fair to say looking at that is how we would probably deal with that we can do that good work of mr. larkin on those types of cases the stair a way way confusing it was a violation, however, the plans don't should a stairway there was stairway that was fine but it was on a notice of violation i noticed that i was confused a little bit about that. >> good evening corey t for planning a couple of quick notes and we didn