mr. duffy and donly indicate to me that the property owner should be identified both on the appeal permit and last week i looked at the records that did not show the property owner agent and there was no form attached to the permit which i understood from matt from building inspection the only way a property owner could not apply for the permit. he could designate someone else as his authorized agent. i spoke with kristin blake who is the property manager of the 1380 greenwich neighbors and i received an e-mail from her. i talked with her about our appellant brief. i received an e-mail on which i was copied that stated her board's position on the permit. it does not indicate to me that 1380 greenwich homeowner association is fit to designate and associated with the construction or the property taxes associated with it. finally regarding our view on the encroachment of the large deck, it maybe more important to ask how three over the counter permits issued nearly two years after the project was

from the departments mr. duffy and mr. sanchez. who would like to start? okay. mr. sanchez. >> thank you, scott sanchez. the plan was not routed for review. however the review in material briefs based on what i saw it appears it did comply with the planning code. we did not review actual plans to confirm that. one of the issues that was raised was whether or not it violated the conditional uses of the project on greenwich and polk street. it was a p ud and conditions of approval. that issue has been raised about easement and building permits for the correct property or not and i would defer to the property building department to discuss issues on that. >> inspector duffy? >> good evening, commissioners. a few things about the permit and the main thing about the permit is that it is under the wrong address. it should have been under 1380 greenwich street based on the property lines even shown on the plans. so, i would say that's the main thing that's wrong with it. the work shown on the plan shows the building code structural review, everything else. a new applicatio

. >> mr. duffy? nothing. >> is there any public comment? please step forward. >> president hwang how many minutes? >> good evening, my name is mark and i am a neighbor at 15 san lorenzo. i am here to comment on the project and basically say that i am against what they are proposing to do here and this roof line seems to be out of hand with the rest of the roof lines in the road. as far as the code compliant as far as i am concerned there is not much of a rear yard it is somewhere in the neighborhood of ten feet and i know that it is an unconforming lot. but we have lived there for many, many years and i used to run in that lot as a kid. and we had no problem with the actual project being done, but there is just in the way that it was put forth and the way that it was built and right now it is a bliet because we have young children and animals and there are holes and open fences and things where kids could get in. so i feel like it has been neglected and i feel that this should be scrutinized at this point heavily because of the history. and

. >> mr. duffy? >> good evening, commissioners. this permit has been issued as a site permit. from dbi and so we are still got a lot of review to do on it for a structural architectal and mechanical and fire and sprinklers that is all to come in yet for dbi and so we are in the early stages of the plan review. i did today speak with robert chung who was the engineer who reviewed the site permit drawings, which do not have anything on them structural or not. but, he did approve them. and in the 2010, san francisco building code, we do have our administrative bulletin for site permit processing. and just one of the items i want to read rt as well. because i think that it is important in this case as much of a purpose of a site permit is to allow a review of preliminary conceptual and schematic designs of proposed construction, there is no detailed plan review of construction details required at the time of site permit review. such detailed review will be done at the time of an addendum review. i am available for any questions and i will be on the demolition if you want to know a

mr. duffy also referenced this, if you look at 4 d, structural design document was not submitted in order to obtain this site permit and you have to do that if you are going to get peer review and you heard the engineer say that we welcome the peer review. they have not complied and the permit should never have been issued. this is a demolition, you do not have to wait until they take all of the walls and ceiling and floors down because we know for a fact that is what is going to happen because the building code does not allow the elements of the building which you are being told are being retained in order to avoid a demolition, the building code does not allow those elements to be used in the new construction. that is a fact. look at the drawing, the foundations, the ceiling joists and walls and floors which you are being told which is how we are avoiding a demolition, because we are keeping these elements of the building. and we know that going in that those elements of the building may not

. >> mr. duffy. >> okay. >> this is just from the department and a point of view on the department and someone wants to take out a brick foundation and upgrade it with the concrete foundation they are going to spend, 20 percent upgrade of accessibility at the entrance door and it appears that it was approved properly and so i am available for any questions. a seismic upgrade will go through the two stories and this appears to be for the ground floor and secondly a seismic solution for a building that is much larger than this, i'm assuming that four retail spaces face the street and therefore the building is quite wide if you do it only with one end you are creating exentricities it is not the best way to do it what would be for public safety or for or seismic upgrade in general. would you, concur. >> i agree, i think that a few weeks ago he had it and the balance and i don't think that you were here, and the i am pabl and the engineers had to get up and dispute each other. it is voluntary and it is

mr. duffy, thank you so much for joining me. what an extraordinary day for your familiar len a indeed the city of boston. tell me exactly what happened. >> first i'd just like to start by thanking everybody in law enforcement for doing an unbelievable job. i mean, hats off to everybody about how quickly this, you know, literally 20, almost 30 hours ago photos released, here we are with some form of closure. of course it will take a lot longer for closure for a lot of the victims and the families. but basically what i'm to understand as it's been told to me, the events that took place with my stepfather and my mother, as soon as the outdoor ban was lifted from the boston and the metropolitan surrounding area, they went outside for a breath of fresh air for the first time all day, being one of the nicer days in early spring boston. they were out in the backyard perusing and david had walked the perimeter of the yard and the wind had picked up during the day and the tarp on his winterized boat had sort of been flapping in the wind

mr. duffy for five minutes. >> good afternoon. you are you here in >> talking a lot about chain cpi. when does social security go insolvent? >> social security solvency is through 2033. >> and medicare solvency goes to 20 23. >> i don't think so. >> per cbo currently, it is 2023 for medicare. does cbs a that? >> yes, but we are talking about the president i did. it extends that late into -- >> in your budget, you are proposing a change to social security that is solvent for 10 years longer than medicare. and what changes do you make in medicare? no structural changes really. you are cutting benefits to providers, doctors, hospitals, and clinics, but you are not structurally changing medicare. provide asi does not much so security as other government programs. >> but does it involve social security? does it affect the care? -- does it affect medicare? >> on a very small basis. >> so why aren't you focused on fixing medicare? >> there are savings that includes increased demands for high-income beneficiaries. >> right. >> it will pay

mr. duffy: from the massacre in newtown, the 23 innocent young first graders who lost their lives to just recently in the boston bombing where many lost heir lives, but specifically a third grader, richard martin, lost his life. richard, a couple weeks before, had just gotten his first communeon. there is a picture of richard in a sharp white suit and a proud toothless smile. he lost his life in boston. his little sister, janney, who was by him was also hit by the bomb. she lost her leg. she just started to take irish dancing, step dancing classes. she'll now be in recovery for months and years from that bombing. we have to look at what's happening in our country with regard to violence against children. as a country we have to soul search about violence against our children. and we have been soul-searching. our families, our communities, we have been soul-searching in this institution about that very violence. we have a conversation about how do we protect our children? how do we keep them fro

planning department, roger duffy is here representing the building inspection and john quan is here, he's the manager of public works, bureau street and mapping. at this time, mr. pa check koe, if you could go over the board meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. >> the board request you turn off all cell phones and pagers, please carry on conversation ins the hallway, the board rule of presentation are as follows, appellant, permit holders and department representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and three minutes for rebuttals f, people affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the 7 or three minutes, they have up to 3 minutes each to address the board but no rebuttal, to assist the board in the accurate preparation of minutes, members of the public who wish to speak on an item are asked but not required to submit a speaker card bh you come up to the podium, speaker cards are available on the left side of the podium. your board also welcomes your comments and suggestions, there are comment forms on the left side of the podium. if you have questions about requesting a rehearing or hearing scheduling, please s