mr. duffy. >> good evening, commissioners joe duffy dbi building permit has been issued as a site permit for the scope of work described and currently going through the addenda reviews an old because of the superstition i did not see anything that would alarm me on building code issues i've heard about the termination of the vents those are three to four feet depending on the type of vent used they would not be allowed to encroach above a property line but can't terminate on property line bring them up to the building to the roof at least three to four feet uaw from the property line no requirement for s t c installation in the walls not that i'm aware of there's a a entitlement for thermal installation and, of course, the typical property line with the requirement for the zero lot lines it is sheetrock on exterior and interior as well as siding on the outside so i'll be happy to answer any questions sorry inspector duffy does the sheet rocks add any core value. >> that you're aware of. >> not

mr. duffy. >> good evening, commissioners joe duffy dbi building permit has been issued as a site permit for the scope of work described and currently going through the addenda reviews an old because of the superstition i did not see anything that would alarm me on building code issues i've heard about the termination of the vents those are three to four feet depending on the type of vent used they would not be allowed to encroach above a property line but can't terminate on property line bring them up to the building to the roof at least three to four feet uaw from the property line no requirement for s t c installation in the walls not that i'm aware of there's a a entitlement for thermal installation and, of course the typical property line with the requirement for the zero lot lines it is sheetrock on exterior and interior as well as siding on the outside so i'll be happy to answer any questions sorry inspector duffy does the sheet rocks add any core value. >> that you're aware of. >> not t

. >> thank you thank you mr. duffy anything further. >> joe duffy dbi commissioners the concrete was not part of original complaint is if it comes up in the future we'll deal with that and donald duh iowa's i didn't was there not me an experienced inspector he'll resolve it there's another complaint on 1949 we're dealing with and we've issued a notice of violation to deal with the fence coming through walls and stuff like this i wanted to make you aware of if it is not green before us but nov issued. >> just a clarify mr. duffy the planter location is part of the nov and the permitted that issue of the concrete against wood is not? >> it wasn't brought in the notice of violation and the planter box got moved and the inspector noted some reference but the completely removed and i don't have any current photos but it was mr. sanchez had a photo of the planter box sitting beside the garage on a concrete pad it has been moved you'll have to ask them who moved it was too close to the wall for the purposes and i think they s

the question is to the building department they look at the ada requirements and that's a cue for mr. duffy. >> so i've learned to what was the been said i agree sometimes, we do so those permits going onsite permits and go the, department and someone has missed something small in this case it is big a impacts the height and you know what wasn't previously agents on you stated ada is very important has to be compiled with so in this case it sound like dbi was requesting a bigger elevators than previously shown on the site plan and again mr. sanchez said the plans are normally not details they're for the planning department to get the prong out so they can do the addenda they will be approved on appeal and the directors hooerlz and stuff like this in this case there was a bigger elevators required i don't know what size of an elevator it depends on the code, etc. i need to know more detail so does that answer your question. >> okay. >> okay. we'll take public comment may i see a show of hands how many people plan on speaking on this item thank you. >> commissioner president lazarus if i can

mr. white horn thank you you can sit down anyone on behalf of the permit holder we'll like to hear from inspector duffy. >> yeah. mr. sanchez as well. >> connect correct. >> scott sanchez planning department the property is located within a rh2 zoning district the permitted to remove a between didn't trigger a be neighborhood discretionary review authorization and possible removing it the jurisdiction requester raised concerns about the unit may convert to the permit indicates some of the print shops and on the two dwelling units and given the fact within an residential district would be concerned because any there could have been a commercial use permitted and it would have continued on providing concern conditions but to restore it the location will not be permitted under the code we'll have concerns and we're not opposed to the board taking jurisdiction to investigate this further and the permit holder intend to withdraw the permit that would be probably better thank you. >> so one question two illegal units he wants to remove one. >> the permit shows that it says the existing legal use is two dwell

. >> mr. duffy. >> the man of the hour. >> good evening, commissioners joe duffy dbi building inspection under appeal is for probably rice street a second floor building with one basement a down in the building permit a renal for instance, and remove the downstairs ground to wall i noticed on the permit that the building permit was approved by dbi, however, didn't go to the planning department and typically those permits should go through the planning department i think mr. sanchez will address that that is one thing i've noticed the plan checker missed that in the writing of the permit so that's one thing on the complaint you heard from the previous speakers the complaint was filed with our department and it was the same with the housing inspection services they were read by the appellant here and the housing inspector everything that was said was pretty accurate from the reports on the overhead that was some the housing inspector took he noticed issued a notice of violation for some as you heard t

. >> joe duffy reminded me (laughter) well that's two of us. >> i have a question mr. sanchez. >> so since this is eventually a iconic part of san francisco lots photos this will change the sceney you have the flat spots this 8 foot 8 by 8 foot foot 8 can they can advertising or logos or lights. >> any of the signed permits again in the district it needs to be a business sign potentially but we would again that could be required a permit so there's a lot of speculation against what may potentially happen but we'll need to review the signage and proposals that is potentially lauding allowed to rereview. >> you look at the congress. >> no different on a stairway penthouses from the building wall as opposed to on the building wall that is not a new structure that was a structure on the approved plan it is clear on all the plans that i've seen an elevator penthouse 9 foot 6 on the plans it is taller on the addenda went up to 14.6 i heard down to 11 or telephone foot so a couple of feet turn around reviewed by the board at the previous hearing maybe a concern or issue about