. >> well, when i first saw mr. duffy a blue substance all over his face and all over his mouth. nobody knew what it was. we walked him outside of the garage where he started throwing up. and he obviously appeared to be intoxicated of some sort. >> because he is vomiting, officer white takes duffy back to the hospital. after receiving the all clear, duffy is placed in the back of officer white's police car, heading for the jail. >> the first thing i did is roll down my window when he got into the car because i knew he would be vomiting. it would be a long trip to jail. it's fresh air for him to help him out and help me out as well. >> with his seat belt on and his hands shackled behind his back, duffy seems secured in the back seat for the trip. >> he wasn't complaining. it was just his actions. he was vomiting. you know, incoherent. he appeared to be intoxicated. >> but then -- >> as i'm driving down the freeway, freeway speed, out of the corner of my eye, i caught him already halfway out my window. instant reaction was

mr. duffy: i have an amendment. the chair: the clerk will report the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 27, offered by mr. duffy of wisconsin. the chair: the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. duffy, and a member opposed each will control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. duffy: today i rise to talk about my commonsense amendment, an amendment that takes aim at excessive bureaucratic rule making at the e.p.a. the e.p.a. has long been known to issue onerous and costly rules with little regard to the impact on american businesses and the families who run those businesses. according to some estimates, 17 of the e.p.a.'s major rules implemented between 2000 and 2013 have imposed an annual economic impact of $90 billion. a $90 billion annual impact per year. which means real jobs and a real impact on our economy. adding to the frustration, it often ignores long-standing executive orders requiring them to improve their own regulatory coordination planning and reviews

. >> anything mr. duffy no any public comment on this item? please step forward. >> and because we'll be speaking through an interpreter okay. >> excuse me. i have two pictures i'd like to show on the overhead. >> slide them down so they're in view. >> leave the - yeah. >> okay. >> good evening, everybody i need to translate more understanding. >> okay. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> almost 20 years >> (speaking foreign language.) >> my name is simon mar, i live at 2026 avenue living here 20 years i come to object to the project on 20th avenue whereby they fill up a 3 story building backyard is back to back to my backyard. >> okay. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> i'm here again second time here to report to you ladies and gentlemen, that i have never received any kind of information regarding this project the only letter he received the two that was designated for september the 14 of this year and november 2nd of this year. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the reason why i'm opposing to this plan was because in 1995 i was buying my pr

. >> thank you mr. duffy. >> good evening, commissioners joe duffy dbi the permit under request as you can see is to comply with the complaint first floor add 3 bedrooms additional 3 bull u full baths and third story remodel the existing bath and legalize one bath and add windows at the site i check the the writing is on the wall on the permit and appears to be okay. except an actual complaint that should have been reviewed it looks like our last entry on the complaint was by inspector miami left a note to contact us on the 7 of october we we received the complaint and we left it note to schedule for the complaint investigation no entry on the 7 of october no plans at the job site the contractors will schedule an investigation i heard a permit issued on monday according the permit but it is interesting to see two permit that comply with the complaint when you have an actual complaint you write it up we want to know what it is you're doing and getting another permit without us getting in there we need to get i

. >> anything mr. duffy no any public comment on this item?se step forward. >> and because we'll be speaking through an interpreter okay. >> excuse me. i have two pictures i'd like to show on the overhead. >> slide them down so they're in view. >> leave the - yeah. >> okay. >> good evening, everybody i need to translate more understanding. >> okay. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> almost 20 years >> (speaking foreign language.) >> my name is simon mar, i live at 2026 avenue living here 20 years i come to object to the project on 20th avenue whereby they fill up a 3 story building backyard is back to back to my backyard. >> okay. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> i'm here again second time here to report to you ladies and gentlemen, that i have never received any kind of information regarding this project the only letter he received the two that was designated for september the 14 of this year and november 2nd of this year. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the reason why i'm opposing to this plan was because in 1995 i was buying my propert

. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. duffy. chairman of oversight investigation subcommittee. >> thank you, mr. chairman. just to reiterate. i believe when asked the panel who had insurance experience, it was mr. woodall and chair white. is that correct? so if i'm to ask the panel, if you were to point out the one insurance expert of all the witnesses today, who would you point to? >> mr. woodall. >> thank you. i would kindly agree with you. mr. woodall. >> i don't want to overstate my expertise. >> does it concern the panel that the one person with insurance expertise is the one individual who dissented in the designation of prudential and metlife? or chair matz, as you say, we're not really looking at the insurance side, we are looking at financial services side so it doesn't matter? >> that's correct. and also the head of the federal insurance office did support the designation and also has considerable experience in the insurance agency. >> did they vote on fsoc? who is the one with insurance expert? >> congress is entitled

mr. sean duffy from wisconsin, as much time as he'd like to speak. mr. duffy: i appreciate the gentleman yielding. tonight i rise to talk about our brothers and sisters in puerto rico. if you watched the news recently, you are well aware there's an economic financial debt crisis taking place right now in puerto rico. our american brothers and sisters are going through an incredibly difficult time. he island has $73 billion in debt. that is 100% of their g.d.p., which is catastrophically high. this debt has had a huge impact on the livelihoods of those who live on the island. their unemployment rate is twice as what it is on the main land, 12.4%. 48% of americans on the island are living in poverty. so, again, half of the island citizens, americans are living in poverty. 10% of the 3.5 million people on the island are leaving, and they're coming to the mainland and it's great because they work hard. they have an amazing culture. it's wonderful they're coming, but if you come on the main you should be coming because you want to come, not because you don't h

mr. tipton for five minutes. >> thank you chairman duffy. mr. speaker. >> i wanted to comment the gentlelady is pointed out all these perrysburg reseize were responsible responsible for oversight prior 2007 failed to the answers let's build another prophecy to look after the failed bureaucracies is supposedly being appointed these bureaucracies failed? i think it's a fascinating difference of opinion and i appreciate your pointing out that we should have a study which cato may have of all the agencies that should be under congressional annual appropriations prevent thought that was a useful contribution. >> thank you mr. speaker. mr. gupta i would like to start with you with regard to personal information. you made the comment that no personal information is collected. is gender and identifier? >> is gender and identifier? gender standing alone with nothing else. >> would have included h.? >> there would be i identifier of those two together? >> we included those elements are those things that can be used to identify an individual? >> i take you

mr. tipton for five minutes. >> thank you chairman duffy. mr. speaker. >> i wanted to comment the gentlelady is pointed out all these perrysburg reseize were responsible responsible for oversight prior 2007 failed to the answers let's build another prophecy to look after the failed bureaucracies is supposedly being appointed these bureaucracies failed? i think it's a fascinating difference of opinion and i appreciate your pointing out that we should have a study which cato may have of all the agencies that should be under congressional annual appropriations prevent thought that was a useful contribution. >> thank you mr. speaker. mr. gupta i would like to start with you with regard to personal information. you made the comment that no personal information is collected. is gender and identifier? >> is gender and identifier? gender standing alone with nothing else. >> would have included h.? >> there would be i identifier of those two together? >> we included those elements are those things that can be used to identify an individual? >> i take you

. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. duffy. hairman of oversight investigation subcommittee. >> thank you, mr. chairman. just to reiterate. i believe when asked the panel who had insurance experience, it was mr. woodall and chair white. is that correct? so if i'm to ask the panel, if you were to point out the one insurance expert of all the witnesses today, who would you point to? >> mr. woodall. >> thank you. i would kindly agree with you. mr. woodall. >> i don't want to overstate my expertise. >> does it concern the panel that the one person with insurance expertise is the one individual who dissented in the designation of prudential and metlife? or chair matz, as you say, we're not really looking at the insurance side, we are looking at financial services side so it doesn't matter? >> that's correct. and also the head of the federal insurance office did support the designation and also has considerable experience in the insurance agency. >> did they vote on fsoc? who is the one with insurance expert? i think the panel has all

mr. speaker. my name is lucywñ duffy. eddinburgh and i thin we need to know in order to progress in our later lives and to fulfill our ambitiousns as mh as we can. within the scottish youth parliament we have 27 policies. 27. it must mean we want a change. the survey i did recently with some 14-year-olds, i found out 18% of time hadn't been taught about things such as genital mutilation or how to do with rape which are really, really important issues. in many places, the curriculum hadn't been updated for 15 years. that means it hasn't been updated since 2000 and it doesn't include modern aspects of the curriculum that it should. as well as the political education. i think we need this because i have just turned 16 so i am eligible to vote in scotland yet i have no idea how to go out and register to vote. sorry, i don't know how to register for a vote and i don't know how the system works so i think we really need this education. yayou.: [ applause ] >> i probably should have said at the start -- and don't take this perso

. >> the chair now recognizes the duffy, chairman of our oversight and investigations subcommittee. >> thank you, mr. chairman. just to reiterate i believe when the chairman asked the panel who had insurance experience, if i recall it was mr. woodall and chair white, is that correct? and so if i'm to ask the panel if you were to point out the one insurance expert of all the witnesses today, who would you point to? t you have two choices. >> mr. woodall. >> i would probably agree with you. does it concern the panel that the one person with insurance expertise is the one individual who dissented in the designation of prudential and metlife? or, chair matz, as you say it doesn't matter because we're looking looking at the financial services side. >> that's correct. it also should be noted that the head of the federal insurance office did support the designation and also has considerable experience in the insurance industry. >> do they vote on fsoc? >> no. >> no, that's right. so, mr. woodall does who is the one with the insurance expertise which is concerning. i think the panel has all agreed on the ov

mr. tom keene. on friday we saw the markets close up, so we are monitoring, and we also are monitoring oil, which continues to slide following the opec meeting. we will break that down with terry duffyeal estate in the experienced economy. what isest will tell us driving people into shopping malls. it is not just sale prices. .an schrager will be joining us it is about the experience, tom. are you enjoying yourself? are you experiencing something? i experienced a very big weekend in miami. an art boat --h we sat down and talked about an art bubble. tom: right now we need to prepare ourselves for nine days out on the fed meeting, and ian shepherdson is with us from pantheon, and jeff saut with raymond james. ian, let me start with you. have you changed the vector that you will establish on december 16? out into next year, or into 2017? ian: we are going to get a small move on the low language that it is gradual and we will take things easy. we remain accommodative. that is going to be a very clear message. we are doing something, but do not panic. my fear about this through next year is that the narrative coming out of the data, which i think will be much stronger than the fed things