mr. duffy: they did. mr. stumpf: yes. mr. y: so as wells fargo back to 2011 is stealing from their customers and by the way, banking is based on trust -- mr. stumpf: correct. mr. duffy: i don't care if it's 10% or 1% or half a percent of the people you do business with, if you're stealing from them, in 2011, 1,000 people are fired for stealing, and what do you do? you don't fix the problem. and 1,000 people are fired in 2012 and you don't fix the problem. and in 2013, 1,200 people are fired and we still have a problem. and you're stealing from people. so how do you -- listen. i guarantee you that any bank in my community, if they were stealing from someone at the lower level, fired and fixed the problem on day one. mr. stumpf: that's what we're trying to do. mr. duffy: no. trying to do, we're five years on. mr. stumpf: let me say as we -- this problem, we didn't -- when somebody would open an unauthorized account, a savings account or checking account, it was not until -- and when an account gets opened and not funded, it's re

>> mr. duffy? mmissioners joe duffy dbi, i too saw the letters yesterday in the folder that was that we sent out on that, all the violations have been corrected. and i don't work in code enforcement down in dbi, but i did bring it up with the senior inspector. back in 2004, when someone filed an appeal with the abatement appeals board, which mr. ryan did do, he got this letter. that was not mean that the violations were cleared, it should have said, we have actually rectified the language on these letters and i would like to put it on the overhead. so, today, if you file an appeal with the abatement appeals board, it would say by order of the director of dbi, the order abatement is revoked for the reason that the case has been appealed. >> now i am not going to sit up here and make excuse foz code enforcement in 2004 or 5, but, the language when someone files an appeal is obviously very wrong. because it gives you the impression that you have taken care of your issues. >> we are looking at the same

mrs. duffy's -- crank up the furnace. that's right. we talked about the age-old argument this morning after a mom's viral on facebook. and, you weighed in. what you said about all of this, that's coming up. sam? >> samantha: all right. i suspect that there will be a lot of family drama over the thermostat starting today. and continuing maybe even into tomorrow. it's cool out there. 54 is your current temperature in the city of cleveland. it's breezy, too. we have a northwest wind. a skirt alert in place for the rest of the afternoon. we will talk about tonight's this. i'm hall of famer jerry west and my life is basketball. but that doesn't stop my afib from leaving me at a higher risk of stroke. that'd be devastating. i took warfarin for over 15 years until i learned more about once-daily xarelto... a latest generation blood thinner. then i made the switch. xarelto? significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. it has similar effectiveness to warfarin. with vitamin k and at least six b

>> mr. duffy? commissioners joe duffy dbi, i too saw the letters yesterday in the folder that was that we sent out on that, all the violations have been corrected. and i don't work in code enforcement down in dbi, but i did bring it up with the senior inspector. back in 2004, when someone filed an appeal with the abatement appeals board, which mr. ryan did do, he got this letter. that was not mean that the violations were cleared, it should have said, we have actually rectified the language on these letters and i would like to put it on the overhead. so, today, if you file an appeal with the abatement appeals board, it would say by order of the director of dbi, the order abatement is revoked for the reason that the case has been appealed. >> now i am not going to sit up here and make excuse foz code enforcement in 2004 or 5, but, the language when someone files an appeal is obviously very wrong. because it gives you the impression that you have taken care of your issues. >> we are looking at the sam

mrs. duffy deserves a nice gift. >> brian: who made that up? >> samantha: a greeting card company, of course. >> brian: it was a cleveland greeting card company that make up sweetest day. does anybody follow sweetest day? >> tia: yes, i do. if i don't get a gift, it will be a problem. >> brian: good luck with that. up next, he heroic fought and died in the attack on pearl harbor and today 75 years later he'll be laid to rest in hisho would you say no to a lot more money? [excited scream] you just won a million dollars! no thanks. nice balloons, though! or no to more vacation days? janet, i'm giving you an extra week's vacation! oh, ah... nooo. no way. who says no to more? time warner cable's all about giving you more. like the most free hd channels and virtually unlimited movies and shows on demand, so you can binge all day. call now. and don't forget the free tv app. get ultra-fast internet with secure home wifi to connect all your devices. saving on mobile data fees, helps big time. switch to time warner cable. for $89.99 a month you'll get f

mrs. duffy's is krarng crank up the furnace. one month posted this to the therm sat. are you wearing a hoodie, number two, is it november? number three, do you pay the gas bill? the moment posted the note to facebook, and it has since gone viral. >> samantha: that's funny. >> tia: she's right. kids want to drain your pocketbook always somehow. >> brian: my kids walk around in t-shirts and shorts, it's freezing in this house. put on a sweatshirt. >> tia: put on some clothes. >> samantha: put on some socks. you don't want cold feet. there's some thermostat battles the coming days. we're going into the 30s overnight. somebody out there is probably -- >> tia: in the 30s? i guess i missed that all morning. i don't know where i was at. >> samantha: you need to wake up. we've been talking about it for a while. look at what's going on out there. we're not in the 30s now, but we will be this time tomorrow. it's going to be cold. sorry, brian, me and tia will laura will just deal with it probably because she is so sweet and doesn't complain about anything. tia and i tomorrow mo

>> just a request for the staff on what was brought up by mr. duffyalignment or the traffic work oban ellis and eddie street and you mentioned that the work being done on this was based on a study in 2005 and that was work that i had helped with as a legislative aid. and for chris daily back, and way back when and in another lifetime. and so wondering, in response to his contention that there is old data that this is based on, i knew and i do know that there was talk of going from two to one lane and looking at their enclosures i am not seeing that in here. and so if you could just that is what he was referring to, but that is the right alignment, to have for those streets, given sort of the study that was done in 2005. >> great, absolutely. and i will see if craig and mta wants to jump up to correct me. my read of this is that it is not reducing the number of traffic lanes but changing the streets from one way to two way, in order to achieve the vision zero goals to calm the traffic down, and well, the original study is old, we have been implementing

the chair now recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. duffy, chairman of our oversight and investigations subcommittee. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and welcome, mr. lew. i want to go back to the iran deal. i think you testified that wire transfer payments were made to iran before the $1.7 billion cash payment. >> i testified that one $900,000 -- >> went before. >> yes. >> that's my recollection, too. and a wire transfer also went to iran after the cash payment? is that correct? >> yes. >> so the fact is, per your testimony, that wire transfers to iran are possible. so i'll take that at face value. >> no, congressman. it's very important -- >> no, no. >> you have to understand what a wire transfer does. >> let me get to my question, though. >> what you stated was incorrect. i want to make it clear what you stated was incorrect. >> you made a wire transfer before the cash payment. you made a wire transfer after the cash payment. and the president told the american people that we could not wire the money. so it leads me to believe that the admini

the chair now recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin, mr. duffy, chairman of our oversight and investigations subcommittee. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and welcome, mr. lew. i want to go back to the iran deal. i think you testified that wire transfer payments were made to iran before the $1.7 billion cash payment. >> i testified that one $900,000 -- >> went before. >> yes. >> that's my recollection, too. and a wire transfer also went to iran after the cash payment? is that correct? >> yes. >> so the fact is, per your testimony, that wire transfers to iran are possible. so i'll take that at face value. >> no, congressman. it's very important -- >> no, no. >> you have to understand what a wire transfer does. >> let me get to my question, though. >> what you stated was incorrect. i want to make it clear what you stated was incorrect. >> you made a wire transfer before the cash payment. you made a wire transfer after the cash payment. and the president told the american people that we could not wire the money. so it leads me to believe that the admini

duffy a republican congressman from the state of wisconsin. i assume still a trump supporter, congressman? >> i'm still with mr. trump. i have five daughters. and what will trump said is offensive to me and my family. that's not the way i think of women. and my wife and my mother and my kids. but i've got to tell you this, i never supported donald trump because of his positions on women or family. i've never agreed with those positions. i supported mr. trump because of his economic positions, how he is going grow the economy, how he is going to keep america safe, how he's going to secure the border. frankly, if we are looking at you know the clinton family and the trump family i don't think either of them represent america very well. the clintons are weird, and mr. trump has been offensive. so we are left to come back to the issues that are going to make america great again. and we have to evaluate those issues and what leader can do it. i still think it's donald trump. >> all right. so when you say that, you don't think that these other issues that are raised -- you are right, they are 11 years old, comments that suddenly came to light --

mr. trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes. trish: joining me right now, rachel campos duffy, trump supporter and fox news contributor, and progressive radio host leslie marshall, a clinton supporter. gosh, leslie, he just can't resist. [laughter] i mean, there he is in the rose garden with the italian prime minister, but he's got to go after trump. >> oh, i don't blame him. [laughter] i mean, it's an election year, he's a democrat, he wants a democrat to take over the white house, and he obviously, working with secretary clinton over the years, the two of them did repair that relationship there when they were running against each other. but i also think he wants to make clear to the american people and not just the president -- i mean, speaker paul ryan and others on the right have said the same thing which is although any election here and throughout the world can have some level of fraud, the stats show that over 14 years with approximately a billion seats, you're looking -- votes, you're looking at approximately 35 cases. trish: and, rachel, what he's talking about in a b

mr. banted called the arrangement unorthodox. the rest of us, call it outright corrupt. >> duffy fox news contributor joins us now.frump get the word out. because he's got golden material here with these scandals from wikileaks and hillary clinton not to mention obamacare. how does he get it out when the media won't do it for us? >> he does what he's doing right now. he can get this information out unfiltered at his rallies. his rallies are covered by the press live because he's interesting. and that's something he has to his advantage and never covered on so regularly so he's got that. other thing he's got going for him is social media. all over the place online. >> absolutely. you know, i'm here in middle america people are talking about. i don't know if they're getting it necessarily from the news maybe if they're watching fox news. but they're getting it on their social media feeds an nay not understand understand who this guy is or cheryl mills but they understand clearly this is the kind of corruptions that going to follow hillary into the white house because this is fundamentally she and bill are and it jus