. >> go ahead i have one more mr. duffy. >> what was done to comply with two novs can you clarify the nature of the nov. >> i don't have the notice of violations with me but the annual notice of violation and put the bombards on the plumbing i think that was the work without the permit that started the work without a permit and dbi cited them and like i said things got off to the wrongs start i don't know they wouldn't have gotten a permit it was shocking but i think from what i'm told they're in a better place now. >> do you know who is the presidio. >> i looked at that up today is started as the owner builder i do so the gentleman's name i'm familiar with in pulling permits the owner is the owner builder. >> thank you. >> the electrical and plumbing permits which i don't have with me would have been issued to a licensed plumbing contractor under the - the building permit can be obtained through the contractor. >> we heard it characterized as 99.2 you said you've substantially done are but those bathrooms assessable and us

wants to go first that's great. >> batter up. >> commissioners joe duffy dbi mr.anchez let me go first for a change. >> (laughter). >> planning building explosion there. >> no, no that's okay. >> all good for a building permit erected a 3 story family building only a site permit the addendum needs to come in and one of our robert is the assigned the dbi engineer and everything he heard as far is pretty good regarding the conversation regarding protecting the adjacent be buildings foundation that is, of course, in the san francisco building code anyway under section chapter three 307 and the under f line e pining needs to be done on any adjacent property that is effected and should go down to the bottom of the foundation for the new property and it is pretty standard procedure discussed between the adjacent property owners and the person doing the work on the new building and it will be under separate permits as you've heard for the actual property it works well and essential and needs to be done the neighborhoods get nervous but i can reassure them it does work an

mr. duffy, welcome to "mad money." good to see you, sir. >> how are you? >> i think you would agree with my characterization, the stock has been a horse. the numbers, what i was looking for, the key me trimetrix, the overall, very much on target. >> absolutely. the strategy that we have in place is what we've had in place the last six years is working. that's a strategy of continuing to grow our attendance through our season pass penetration, migrating our single day tickets over to single pass. that's been very successful. >> just a gigantic number of people with these passes in a short period of time. >> that's right. so we have been very successful doing that. one of the reasons why it's been so successful is because it's a great value, and as we look at our guest satisfaction scores, particularly value for the money, that continues to increase. we've been adding a lot of events of the years. fright fest, ol dholiday in the park. mardi gras. >> what will i see if i go? >> it's going to be another great event for us. you're going to see floats. these are

the addendum one is not appealable this is our only shot to get the conditions imposed he respect mr. duffy but he's got a lot of projects going on i will submit we want to make sure to my client to make sure those things get enforced okay. >> anyway so we will ask again, the conditions either be encompassed by the board or alternatively that matter be continued to give the parties enough time to work out an agreement in writing in which case we ask the appeal will be withdrawn. >> just to clarify to dig this material you have to grout it not a trick deal you can't dig in soil once you change the vertical elevation by shoring and if you go really at all put in under pine so it is in everyone's best interest to work with the project sponsor on developing a shoring plan and i think work working with the project sponsor in the building department the inspector duffy will be great and inquires a geotech to eliminate the trust and work with the building department particularly joe duffy. >> you said your client doesn't get the plans under the 311 artists the plans required. >> what was given to

mr. lopez said you got a good case i've seen m rebuttal time. >> very good. >> inspector duffy to hold anything for you. >> scott sanchez planning department. thank you for having the hearing tonight for this case so appreciate the comments and concerns by the appellant just as some background the proposal to add a between to the the subject property at that didn't feature as the unit is proposed not code compliant enclosure on a rear yard in order for the street that didn't meet the requirement of planning code so with that there are two processes that one what undertake used to be one process which was a variance process but for the past two years there's the ability to add do accessary dwelling now the division the dwelling unit allows administration review the project and allows for granting of waivers like the endorse in this case in order to quality for the waiver under the adu provisions it has to be 15 by 1 foot open area that faces on to which this qualifies for the benefit of review the ability that are added under the program that are rental unit to create we haven't had the ability

duffy of wisconsin. >> thanks for having me on. >> why is mr. trump saying the press doesn't cover terror attacks enough? >> i think you are playing into that right now. in the broader conversation you are now airing on your network the greatest hits over the last couple of years of terror attacks that have taken place not just in america but in europe, so the conversation on terrorism as it comes through you and other networks, americans at the forefront of their mind is how dangerous terror is in their communities and are why this pause may be important, and why we take a special look at who is coming in to make sure they want to be part of the american dream and want to be peaceful and don't want to do americans harm? >> you make such a good point, in other words, we are taking the bait. >> you are, well done. you are driving the conversation. >> thank you. >> and reminding everybody. >> so in other words, this was put out by the president as a red herring to try and scare americans? >> well, not to scare, to remind. i don't know that for sur

duffy: but many countries have this. chair yellen: yes, in connection of -- with back taxes. >> the chernow recognizes the gentleman from georgia, mr. scott. representative scott: i want to thank you for our work over the past two years together in dealing with and addressing this alarming high unemployment rate in the african-american community and that is especially rampant within the african-american community of young african-american men ages 18 to 39. i also appreciate your suggesting to us when we discuss that and i will never forget what you told me "inflation and unemployment is indeed your cool mission, butal when it comes to unemployment like this, you have only a blunt instrument and what we should do is develop legislation." in response to representative clay, you reiterated that. now we have done that and we have two very important pieces of legislation that address that. by myself and my cosponsors kevin cramer of north dakota, republican, my good friend reverend emanuel cleaver, democratic cosponsor from missou andedia love -- mia love, the representative from ohio, along with pete sessions. we need some help in get

mr. patterson focused on he spoke at length about the same at the board of appeals the focus of his comments the board called inspector joe duffy testified to the board that the 1946 application was individual of no effect and super sit down by the planning code and he's not forwarded it importance whatsoever so the requirements in effect are the current planning code and not 1946 permit that was issued prior to the planning code adoption important to include the proposed addition will bring the property to approximately the same height those the apartment this the massing will be binge smaller than my other building on the block with richard son and chestnut all the dr requesters here occupied homes two or three times the massing of my the project sponsors home after the addition i'd like to mention also that the comments made about the notch are not true not correct at all the stair that is going into the notch is the stair to the third floor it is not a stair to a deck and i'd like to introduce jason the project architect if you'll have comments i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you very much. >> j

mr. acosta is the first hispanic to join president trump's cabinet and happening on a day when we are seeing immigrants protest across the country. they're calling it a day without immigrants. rachel campos duffyoins me with more. there is a little irony in all of that. hispanics are upset with donald trump, not all, but some of them, and they're protesting, not going to work today, and the guy take over the labor department is hispanic and going to work. >> sure, and the afl-cio and all the groups that are getting all these people to come out and protest have been telling these hispanics that he's a racist, that donald trump, president trump is a racist and here he comes and nominates the son of immigrants, a cuban-american, the first hispanic on his cabinet and even the labor unions had to say this is our president, we like this guy. trish: they said they like him. they didn't like puzder because he was very tough on the minimum wage issue, and he said i don't want a federal minimum wage. the unions didn't like that. >> they didn't like that. and today we have the day without immigrants which, by the way, i think it's such a fraudulent premise, this is what the left does, they conflate immig

mr. lopez said you got a good case i've seen m rebuttal time. >> very good. >> inspector duffy to hold anything for you. >> scott sanchez planning department. thank you for having the hearing tonight for this case so appreciate the comments and concerns by the appellant just as some background the proposal to add a between to the the subject property at that didn't feature as the unit is proposed not code compliant enclosure on a rear yard in order for the street that didn't meet the requirement of planning code so with that there are two processes that one what undertake used to be one process which was a variance process but for the past two years there's the ability to add do accessary dwelling now the division the dwelling unit allows administration review the project and allows for granting of waivers like the endorse in this case in order to quality for the waiver under the adu provisions it has to be 15 by 1 foot open area that faces on to which this qualifies for the benefit of review the ability that are added under the program that are rental unit to create we haven't had the ability

mr. patterson focused on he spoke at length about the same at the board of appeals the focus of his comments the board called inspector joe duffyified to the board that the 1946 application was individual of no effect and super sit down by the planning code and he's not forwarded it importance whatsoever so the requirements in effect are the current planning code and not 1946 permit that was issued prior to the planning code adoption important to include the proposed addition will bring the property to approximately the same height those the apartment this the massing will be binge smaller than my other building on the block with richard son and chestnut all the dr requesters here occupied homes two or three times the massing of my the project sponsors home after the addition i'd like to mention also that the comments made about the notch are not true not correct at all the stair that is going into the notch is the stair to the third floor it is not a stair to a deck and i'd like to introduce jason the project architect if you'll have comments i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you very much. >> jason