mr. durkin explain na that. >> i can comment on that, there was a closet there before and the reason that the wall is thicker than a typical wall thickness that tha* a multistorey moment frame that's stacked on the rear of the building and that column cannot move, it's fixed, and it goes all the way down to the foundation on the rear facade, that's why that's shown that way. >> well, i see your indication for the frame but if you look at the -- your column line a, there used to be a little set back there like a notch in that floor plate. >> i really don't recall having a setback there, the rear of the building is not -- >> perhaps you should look at your drawing a1.2 of the original set that was given to us. >> mr. sanchez, did you want to comment? >> so, what is the vertical shaft you removed or something for some reason. >> if i can explain, at the previous hearing, the plans that were submitted by the permit holder were the original plans that were heard by the planning commission and those plans had the elevator at the rear, so that's something i can put on the overhead. >> we submitt