mr. elberling. >> good afternoon, supervisors. this project is not proposed -- the housing part is an incredibly sweetheart deal for building and should not go forward. if they had started with 14% of the unit available to low and very low households, and another 4% to middle-income houses, and then added 7% to get to the 25% number, that would be a great program, but that is not what they did. they include out the inclusionary ordinance. all the rest is going to be basically 100% of median and above. it's very clear that this is intentional class discrimination against the poor people of the southeast of san francisco and in particular, it's going to make any homeless housing in this project highly unlikely. even worse when you look at the few calculations that they have inserted into the language, the actual amounts that they pay when they fee out somehow would only be about two thirds if they were complying with the inclusionary housing ordinance. even though they could give the city three sites for inclusionary housing, they d