mr. enbridge, you have a one-minute rebuttal. >> to mr.thomas' point, he's misleading the commission in a plan trying to show the [indiscernible] by surveyor, by your staff and d.b.i. and they presented no evidence to show that those calculations are inaccurate. in the code section [indiscernible] -- he's actually referring to [indiscernible] but should be referring to 188(a) which says a project that is not complying can undergo a change as long as it does not undergo [indiscernible]. >> thank you. that will conclude the public comment portion of this hearing. it is now before you, commissioners. >> [indiscernible] -- i believe this project should be further described. i think this project should be further discussed, but i find myself in a great deal of comution and contradiction about what is rightnfusion and contra about what is right. i'm completely open to look at this package, whatever way is the right way, i personally don't have any ability to put it on the right or the wrong. this is a project that has multiple violations. we are

mr. enbridge, you have a one-minute rebuttal. >> to mr.thomas' point, he's misleading the commission in a plan trying to show the [indiscernible] by surveyor, by your staff and d.b.i. and they presented no evidence to show that those calculations are inaccurate. in the code section [indiscernible] -- he's actually referring to [indiscernible] but should be referring to 188(a) which says a project that is not complying can undergo a change as long as it does not undergo [indiscernible]. >> thank you. that will conclude the public comment portion of this hearing. it is now before you, commissioners. >> [indiscernible] -- i believe this project should be further described. i think this project should be further discussed, but i find myself in a great deal of comution and contradiction about what is rightnfusion and contra about what is right. i'm completely open to look at this package, whatever way is the right way, i personally don't have any ability to put it on the right or the wrong. this is a project that has multiple violations. we are