mr. epstein. >> there is another option, mr. dufty, that we continue this case if we can modify the permit. perhaps we should continue this and have you provide the direction that the department requires. of i am sure that there are elements of the work which needs to be finished for other tenants and perhaps then clean up the paperwork through the modification of this board. >> the board would issue the permit. >> we would condition the existing permit. >> it sounds like the board which a strike all ordinance except for the bathroom in model. is that acceptable? >> a rather it was comprehensive. perhaps there are items there veto about that needs to be done, otherwise there are other tenants? >> you would run into a lot of work if the violation is there. some of it would be ok if what i know this is quite a lot of violations that would not be covered under this from the foot that is not a solution. >> that way we can clean this up. >> that does not affect this plumbing permits. i think we would like to go ahead with the bathroo

mr. epstein. was she effected -- she evicted? >> she got a one week stay. >> there is a possibility that her unit may be vacated? >> she would have used of the bathroom without a doubt. commissioner garcia: assuming you get a new permit. commissioner peterson: that was my question. >> on that permit, i agree with mr. duffy to address the borad -- broad and general things. the completion of the bathroom, i would absolutely past that we be permitted to complete that. i think he plumbing pipe is on there. >> i think you would be better to take that offline with mr. duffy. >> commissioners? >> i will start, but i am not sure i am going anywhere. it is difficult to see the position from both sides. on the one hand, i don't know why you appeal something that takes you three months alcohol stopping the work that you want. i am not quite sure what to do. commissioner garcia: i am concerned about dealing with things that have to do with code and the authority. i would think that the accommodations thing and all that would have been a rent

mr. epstein. further, i filed because no precautions or warnings or even admission to lead based paint on the site, and the steps required when dealing with this removal. only after the appeal the receive a certified letter notice the was a government pamphlets i have included in my brief for you. the precautions were taken to protect me or my neighbors of the hazards. his construction workers took no safety measures. they put on some of its limited the work downstairs, but they never talked to me about that. i've believe that he is using a method called constructive division process to harass me out of my home. and without giving any alternatives to a bathing facilities, i made my -- and it has made my life very difficult. i have been without a shower now for a long time. since may 11. and when i filed my appeal, i was told that he would be getting a phone call in half an hour, and his crew worked late into the night against the orders and work to do more work that was not -- i don't believe it w