mr. farah's? i don't think so. has it mandated abortion across america? dr. yoshihara? no it hasn't. the americans with disabilities act is the implementing act that we adopted ahead of the treaty for disabilities. the bond case is dealing with the implementation act on the convention of weapons treaties. two separate actions by congress one of ratifying convention on chemical weapons and two passing a law on the implementation act, the loss law of the land. now the supreme court decided that law is proper. so conflating these two and saying it's all about the same thing. one of our scholarly colleagues the junior senator from texas said in a piece in the "washington post" if the supreme court concludes the treaty can be used to prosecute americans regardless of their constitutional rights around clarifications. the prosecution is not under a treaty. the prosecution is under the implementation act. it's different. it's a law of congress. i am just stopped cold here with this argument by mr. farah's that the americans with disabilities act is going to putting into homeschooling in ame