mr. feynman. >> good evening once again. i just want to respond to a few of the items that were raised by some of the commenters. one of the commenters indicated that the basis of her objection was that she wanted the city to move towards underground of utility structure. i just want to stress that's really not at issue in connection with this appeal whatsoever. article 25 only allows companies putting wireless equipment to do so on existing poles in the public right of way. this has nothing to do with undercounting of the city. the city adopts underground utility districts there's been opposed to place it on. so, that's maybe a concern to that particular citizen, but that has nothing to do with this particular permits. it was, again, the issue about the city charter the arts commission and i know that pres. honda one and city staff to respond to that but it's quite correct that was an issue debated at some length the previous set of hearings and city staff we need on that issue and even the city attorney's office and contac