mr. fletcher? >> give mr. chief justiit please the court we agree with petitioner's the fifth circuit was wrong to appnly rational basisiew because texas content burden on speech that is prd for adult similar federal law this court agreed the basis for applying a different sd here. the state fm restricting the description of pornography t childrenine. justice s have done it in ick-and-mortar stores and theaters. the application o strict scrutiny w urge the court to emphasize three points. compelling interest in protecting children from arthel dren online secon loss during that interest is about as long as it does not burden adult access more than necsa to exclude children. third, ashcroft per luminary application oftrict scrutiny 20 years ago d not prevent courts frompholding age verification requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the jusce departm was arguing inav of. and playboyoft. either of those that y ever suggest or argue

mr. fletcher? >> give mr. chief justice admit please the courte agree with petitionhe fifth circuit was wrong to apply only rational ba review because texas law content burden on speech that is protected for adults. similar federal law this court ed the bas for applying a different standard here. the states from restricting the description of pornography to children online. justice states have done it in theaters.nd-mortar stores and the application of strict scrutiny we urge the court to emphasize three points. compelling interest in protecting children from arthel children online second loss that interest is about as long as it not burden adult access more than necessary to exclude children. and third, acroft per luminary application of strict scrutiny years ago did not prevent courts from upholding age verion requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the justice department was arguing in favor of. and playboy and ashcroft. either

mr. fletcher? >> give mr. chief justice admit please the court we agree with petitioner's the fifth circuit was wrong to apply only rational basis review because texas law content burden on speech that is protected for adults. similar federal law this court agreed the basis for applying a different standard here. the states from restricting the description of pornography to children online. justice states have done it in inbrick-and-mortar stores and theaters. the application of strict scrutiny we urge the court to emphasize three points. compelling interest in protecting children from arthel children online second loss during that interest is about as long as it does not burden adult access more than necessary to exclude children. and third, ashcroft per luminary application of strict scrutiny 20 years ago did not prevent courts from upholding age verification requirements today. the verification experience has shown other approaches are not working for a walk on the courts laws the justice department was arg