mr. flores. mr. flores, no. mr. mullvaney no. mr. young? >> no. >> mr. young, no. mr. amash, no. mr. ita, no. mr. gunta, no. mr. woodall? mr. woodall, no. mr. van hollen? >> yes. >> mr. van hollen, aye. ms. schwarz aye. ms. captor mr. doggett aye. mr. blumenour aye. ms.ccollum. mr. pascrell? mr. honda? mr. honda, aye. mr. ryan of ohio? mr. ryan,aye. ms. ms. moore, aye.ms. castor? aye. mr. schueler? n. schueler, aye. mr. garrett? mr. garrett, no. >> are there any members, other change their vote? if not, the clerk shall report. >> mr. chairman, on that vot ar. 's miss castor, i think, isn't it? yeah, i do, but i just want to -- yep. go ahead and offer. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> so d by ms. cast an amendment at the desk. >> the gentle lady from florida has an amendment at the desk. the clerk will designate. >> anre by ms. castor relating to medicare. >> the gentle lady is recognized for nine minutes. >> thank you, mr addition to the republican plan that breaks the promise of medicare and ends medicare as we know it, the republicans also proposed to raise the cost of prescription d

mr. flores and it's a personal offee for 80% of the bike trails in texas as an oklahoman. so if you would feel free to take that on as well. >> thank you, mr. langford. trust me, we're a net donor to the highway fund. let's it would have been nice if we used part ofhethis instead of $ hard-earned taxpayer funds. i want to address the revenue side of mr. blenauer's amendment. first of all it relies on some false premises and that is that you can raise taxes on job creators and get more revenue. you cannot. revenue. i gave you a quote this morning from the uk where they rolled back their top tax rates and corporate tax rates because their h to their economy. what we need is an energy plan and we propose that. you get a lot of benefits, higher revenues to the federal government and republicans pre get a couple other benefit out of it. you get more jobs, more american jobs as we're mining for american energy. and you get lower yield cost and bargain. now, you know, what we're proposing to do is to raise taxes on people that already pa. you know, apple makes more money on this i

mr. flores. >> no. >> mr. flores, no. mr. mulvaney. >> no. >> mr. mulvaney, no. mr. heulskamp. >> no. >> no, mr. young. >> no. >> fl young, no. mr. akita. >> no. >> mr. akita, no. mr. again ta. >> no. >> mr. genta, no. mr. woodall. >> no. >> mr. woodall, no. mr. akin. >> no. >> mr. akin, no. mr. van hollen. >> yes. >> mr. van hollen, aye. ms. schwartz. >> aye. >> ms. schwartz, aye. ms. kaptur. >> aye. >> ms. kaptur, aye. mr. blumenauer, aye. ms. mccole m, aye. mr. yarmouth, aye. mr. pakkarel, aye. mr. hahn donda, aye. ms. moore, aye. mr. schuler, aye. ms. bass, aye. ms. bonamici, ay. mr. chairman. >> no. >> mr. chairman, no. mr. ribble. >> aye. >> mr. ribble, aye. >> are there any other members looking to vote or to change their vote? clerk will report. >> mr. chairman, on that vote, the ayes are 17 and the noes are 20. >> the amendment is not agreed to. next we will recognize mr. van hollen for the purposes of amendment. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i have an amendment at the desk. >> clerk will designate the amendment. staff will distribute copies. >> an amendment o

mr. flores. mr. flores no. mr. heels camp no. mr. young, mr. young no. mr. morn. mr. mosh, no. mr. oak compete that. mr. ginta, no. mr. woodall, mr. simpson, no, mr. van holland. mr. van holland. aye. ms. schwartz, ms. captor, aye. mr. doggett. mr. mccollum. mr. yarmith. mr. pascarell. mr. honda, mr. honda, aye. mr. ryan, aye. ms. wasserman schultz. mr. schuler, aye. mr. bass, aye. mr. chairman. >> no. >> mr. dharm. no. >> any other members looking to vote or to change their vote. if not the clerk shall report. >> mr. chairman, on that vote, the ayes are 13 and the nos are 20. >> the matter is voted downing. >> mr. ryan. >> i have an amendment another the desk. >> the amendment and the staff will distribute copies of the amendment. >> the generous gentleman will be recognized for four minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman, this amendment will end the tax subsidies to the bill oil and find the commodities future trade commission in order to more effectively enforce some of the gambling that's going on in the commodities market now, this will repeal tax subsidies into the integrated oi

mr. flores no. mr. mulvany, mr. huls camp no, mr. young, mr. young, no. mr. amash. mr. amash. no. mr. akita. mr. ginta, no. mr. van hole land. mr. van holland. ms. schwartz, no. mr. doggett, aye. mr. yarmith aye. mr. honda aye, mr. wright a. mr. ryan aye. ms. waszman schultz. mr. schuler aye. ms. bass aye. mr. chairman. mr. chairman no. >> any others looking to vote or to change their vote. if no, the clerk shall report. on. >> on that vote the ryes -- >> the amendment is not agreed to. i now yield to ms. bonamiche. >> an amendment offered by ms. bonamiche relating to wall street. >> thank you. i'm proud to offer this -- >> do you want to do the 15 or the 10? >> can i have 12 and a half? >> we have been watching this health budget committee mark up of the republican budget plan for much of the day here on cspan 3. our coverage is now moving to cspan 2. and you can also see out online on cspan.org. >> we do this in part by put -- coming up on cspan 3, british prime minister david cameron faces questions from parliament during prime minister's question. that's followed business the brit

mr. flores, no. mr. mulvaney, no. mr. young. mr. young, no. mr. mosh. mr. mosh, no. mr. unta, no. mr. aiken. mr. aiken, no. mr. hollen. mr. van hollen, aye. miss schwartz, aye. miss captor, aye. mrs. mccollum, aye. mr.aye. mr. honda -- aye. mrs. wasserman-schultz. >> aye. mr. caster, aye. aye.chuler. mr. campbell. no. >> mr. campbell, no. mr. chairman. >> no. >> mr. chairman, no. miss bass. miss bass, aye. >> any other members looking to vote or to change their vote? if not, the clerk shall report. >> mr. chairman on that vote, the ayes are 16. the the nos are 20. >> the nos have it.e recognize katherine. >> thank you, members of the committee. i have an amendment. >> the staff will hand out copies of the amendment. the gentle lady from ohio. >> an amendment offered by miss castor. >> gentle lady from ohio is recognized for nine minutes. >> thank you very much. the amendment i'm proposed would establish the veterans job corps. it would employ 20,000 returning veterans in project to reserve the parks, the state parks and other public lands and touch up federal facility ls. the american

mr. flores, no. mr. mulvaney, no. mr. young, no. mr. woodall? no. mr. yhuelskamp, no. mr. van hollen, aye. ms. schwartz, aye. mr. doggett, aye. mr. blumenhauer, aye. ms. mccollum, aye. mr. honda, aye. mr. ryan of ohio, aye. ms. wasserman-shultz, aye. ms. moore? aye. ms. castor, aye ms. bass? ms. bass, aye. ms. bonamici? aye. mr. chairman? no. >> the clerk shall report. >> mr. chairman, on that vote, the ayes are 14, the nos are 20. >> nos have it, the amendment is not agreed to. >> do you have an amendment at the desk. >> the clerk will report on the status -- >> the midwest working together. an amendment offered by ms. mccollum related to women's health. >> thank you. women deserved access to affordable health care. unfortunately before the women health care act, women were not guaranteed access. a woman was dpe nighed health care buzz she had a c-section. in florida, a woman denied coverage because she was given anti-aids education after a sexual assault. a senior could not afford her prescription drugs while in the medicare doughnut hole. a woman in south dakota could b

mr. flores speak later on this morning. >> at this time, we will move over to mr. price for his part of the explanation. i yield ten minutes to dr. price. >> thank you, mr. chairman. let me commend you and the members of this committee and the staff who have worked diligently to come up with whatible is a wonderfully positive and visionary document and getting us on a path to economic vitality. we're here today to consider a budget which is our positive blueprint for how we can and must address a predictable and looming crisis while putting our nation on a path to future prosperity. american people, as i've on then said, are smarter than the politicians here in washington. they understand that washington cannot continue to spend beyond its means. ignoring this crisis, which we believe the president does, clearly with his budget, is absolutely irresponsible and reckless. that's why we're bringing forth this budget resolution to reduce en broken bureaucracy, and to ensure that taxpayers and job creatorsephar. this budget is a bold vision for our nation's future. it r

mr. flores. i yield back. >> gentleman is recognized for one minute for the purposes of closing. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i think one of the arguments we just heard repeated several times is one of the most bizarre arguments i've ever heard. that is because we don't solve the problem of our deficit in one fell swoop with one step that we shouldn't do it. if that were the case looking at the other side, why would we cut the s.n.a.p. program? why would we cut head start? why would we cut head start and education programs and foreign aid. none of those by themselves helped get us in our deficit. this has to be a balanced plan. the democratic budget which we will introduce is a balanced plan. we cannot just look at the expenditure side of the problem when we have a revenue problem, as well. anyone who doesn't think we have a revenue problem is not looking at this in a balanced way. it does not solve the problem by itself. it is an incremental approach. it is something we have to do to get our defic

ribble - mr. flore arrest -- mr. mulvaney --mr. huelscamp -- mr. young -- mr. amash -- mr. okita -- gin mr.ta -- mr. waddell -- mr. van hollen. ms schwartz - ms. captor -- mr. doggettt -- mr. blumenauer - ms. - mr. pascarel - mr. honda -- mr. ryan of ohio --ms. wasserman schultz -- ms. more - ms. caster - mr. shuler --ms. bass -- ms. bonamici -- mr. chairman. mr. garrett - >> are there any other member is looking to vote for change their vote? if not, the clerk shall report e ayes are 13th,e aes and the no's are 20. >> let's go ahead. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> the amendment off m for bys. caster. the clerk will designate them as an amendment offered ms. caster related to medicare. >> the gentle lady is recognized for nine minutes. >> in addition to the republican plan that breaks a promise of medicare and ends medicare as we know it, the republicans also proposed to raise the cost of prescription drugs and/the smart new benefits and popular consumer reforms that have been in place for two years now and are working very well. this is a double whammy for our older neighb

mr. flores. the chair: the gentleman from texas is recognized for three minutes. mr. flores: i thank my colleague, mr. mcclintock. mr. chairman, the progressive caucus budget amendment creates devastating cuts to our nation's defense. our federal government's primary responsibility under the constitution is to provide for the common defense, for the security of all americans. this budget amendment causes the federal government to abdicate this important responsibility. this substitute amendment guts the defense department, by calling for cuts that are $900 billion deeper than the nearly half a trillion dollars that the president already proposed to be cut from the defense plan that he proposed just one year ago. this substitute has no specific plan to replace the sequester which secretary of defense panetta said would cause catastrophic consequences and which would devastate our department of defense. this amendment ignores our constitutional responsibility and tells our troops in the field that regardless of where the mission is and what state it is, that we're going

mr. flores. >> thank you. the real problem here, the real failure was not wall street and the banks. the real villain was congress. the real villain in the meltdown was because congress didn't police to agencies that helped create, fannie mae and freddie mac. and they allow the executives of those two organizations to make hundreds of millions of dollars into paid millions of dollars to lobby congress and what they got for it was protection, protection from the other side of the aisle. there were several requests made to further reform fannie mae and freddie mac and they were all rebuffed by the dumb a time a cretz in this congress. and then you pass dodd-frank and dodd-frank shot all the innocent victims including dozens of community banks in my district and just like was said earlier, and they are having to hire people to track regulations instead of to make loans. the other victims in this process are the poor. because of the cost of compliance has gone up so much for bank accounts, low dollar bank accounts, tanks will no longer take or set up bank accounts for the poor. so they h

flores also testified she had no independent confirmation that mr.euman had not had the visions. >> i'm not going to defend the defense. you're a psychologist, you don't tend to have corroboration for visions. the problem is, that he is very selective about when it is that he comes forward with these visions. why did he come forward at one point and not others? why did it seem that the visions transform from sounds into visions? the defense is in a tough spot. their own experts have not been great. >> it's really difficult to prove insanity, in any court case. >> they've got the burden. the defense. the prosecution has the burden to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, except in case like this. they say, i'm legally insane. okay, you have to prove that. that he didn't understand right from wrong. >> there was rlots of focus on the victim's wife, an -- andrea sneiderman. they're saying she manipulated them. >> of course they're saying that. the defense is left with nothing bet to do than this, point to somebody else. the state says, great, they h

flores also testified on the stand that she had no independent confirmation that in fact mr.eing these visions of olivia newton-john and barry white. how damaging is that? >> well, look, i'm not going to defend this defense because i think they're in big, big trouble here but when you're in a spot where you're a psychologist and you're evaluating what someone has said, you don't tend to have corroboration for visions. now, the problem is that he's very selective about when it is that he comes forward with these visions. why did he come forward at one point and not at other points? why does it seem that the visions transform from sounds into visions, et cetera? so they're in a really tough spot here, the defense and it's compounded by the fact that the defense's own experts have not been great. >> and it's really difficult to prove insanity, in any court case. >> again, they've got the burden. the defense. the prosecution has the burden to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, except in a case like this. where you say, i am legally insane. okay. then you have to then prove