mr. foster did not suffer from the disabilities and vulnerability of the accused in the present case. and the slow benefit of the disability and vulnerability. it is clear that the facts in foster are dissimilar to the facts in the present case. it is so that like foster the accused was reacting to a perceived threat and that soon after the incident, he, like the man in the foster matter tried to resuscitate the deceased and that he was very emotional and suffers for trauma, even 18 months after the incident. how much, there are a number of important distinguishing features. one, in the foster matter, the accused did not know that there was a person behind the door. in the present case, the accused did. he stated that after he heard the bathroom window slide open and the slamming of the door, the noise or movement in the toilet confirmed to him that there was someone in the toilet. two, in the foster case, only one shot was fired. and it had been aimed above the roof, not into the door. in contrast, the accused in the present case deliberately fired four shots into the door. three, in

mr. foster is being punished or relatively lightly for what he has done and secondly, assist mr. ster to interact with needful people and to help him to find some form of emotional eek librium while doing so. i have decided the appropriate sentence in this case is one of three years imprisonment and suspended for five years on the condition he is not convicted of culpable homicide caused by assault and during the period of imprisonment and secondly, he performs 300 hours of community service over one year which commences running on the date of the sentence. he is to be placed under the supervision of mr. phillip hall. mr. hall will decide upon mr. foster is to do in assisting the rotary club in any of the various charitiable undertakings which it engages in, closed quote. counsel for the accused submitted that the effects in the foster case bore similarities to those in the present case. he considered that in this instance the accused, by discharging four shots into the door, created a more dangerous situation. he argued on the other hand mr. foster did not suffer from the disabil

mr. foster did not suffer from the disabilities and vulnerability of the accused in the present case. and that the slow benefit of the disability and vulnerability. it is clear that the facts in foster are dissimilar to the facts in the present case. it is so that, like foster, the accused was reacting to a perceived threat and that soon after the incident, he, like the accused in the foster matter, tried to resuscitate the deceased and that he was very emotional and suffers for trauma, even 18 months after the incident. however, there are a number of important distinguishing features. one, in the foster matter, the accused did not know that there was a person behind the door. in the present case, the accused did. he stated that after he had had the bathroom window slide open, and the slamming of the door, the noise or movement in the toilet confirmed to him that there was someone in the toilet. two, in the foster case, only one shot was fired and it had been aimed above the roof, not into the door. the accused in the present case deliberately fired four shots into the door. three, in

mr. johnson. >> good evening, commissioners foster johnson for at&t at&t didn't have any objection to hearing this appeal this evening or continuing to a later date, however, i have a request when i'll explain one of the issues that was raised on the briefing the only evidence that the gentleman offered in jurisdiction request is hearsay the government codes specifically says the administrative bodies can't basis their evidence on hearsay it appears that is what the board did my request give the board to give a reason other than the record why the board thinks the rule didn't appeal or at&t is incorrect about the law i ask this because this case that will be appealed and it's only fair to the trial judge which the reasons why you think you can take this decision and it's important that the judge know that it's also a requirement from the california supreme court that our findings reach the analytic gap between the evidence and the ruling i simply request that the board give some reason on the record so the court can look at it why you think you have jurisdiction. >> ms. short. >> the department ha

mr. matt welch, andnnl kmele foster, i am kennedy,you. thank you for watching. ♪ ♪ lou: good evening, everyone. the obama administration engaged in what is a three-pronged political battle engaging with the pentagon come if the governors and the american public about how to deal with americans returning from the ebola stricken region of west africa. fox news has confirmed the joint chiefs chairman, geneeal martin dempsey, has recommended a 21 day quarantine for all of our troops returning from service in western africa. the white house today however refused to say whether the president agreed, despite the revelation that the u.s. army is already quarantining for 21 days, 11 individuals who arrived working in west africa. the white house also not denying reports that they had pressured the governors of new york and new jersey to ease their mandatory 21 day quarantine, which they put in place last week from health care workers returning from west africa. >> members of this administration have been in close touch with state and local officia

havewo major candidates outlined far different approaches to fostering economic development in new york. mr. cuomo has established targeted programs like the buffalo billion and start up new york in which he claims successes while mr. astor and no -- mr. astorino proposes lower taxes and a less real tory climate will result in even more success. -- less regulatory climate will resort in even more success. >> i think it is a very good question. i have had some experience with start up new york. i am not in favor of it. i think the idea of bringing companies and and have an -- and having a 10-year tax break is good news to me. but i have tried it with some company's i have worked with and it is difficult to deal with. it does not include a lot that it needs to include. so i am not a big fan of it. i have seen a lot of commercials lately. 200 millionent dollars in commercials. it sounds good but it is not working that well. i like the economic development idea. but i think we should do this as people of the state of new york, and thehe government state representatives who are telling you what

mr. mcdermott. >> good evening. this it would with a question on economic development. the two major candidates have outlined far different approaches to fosteringc development in new york. mr. cuomo has established targeted programs like the buffalo union instead of new york in which he claims successes and mr. astorino proposes lower taxes and less stringent regulatory climate will result in even more success. what is your take on that? look forward to what the other candidates have to say? >> moderator: one minute to respond. mcdermott: really good question. i had some experience with start of new york and i am not in favor of it. the idea of bringing companies in with a 10 year tax rebate sounds good to me but i have tried with some companies i worked with and is very difficult to deal with. it doesn't include a lot that it needs to include. i am not a big fan of it. i have seen a lot of commercials lately, 2 did million dollars on commercials. it sounds good but it is not working that well. i like the economic development idea but i think we should do this as people of the state of new york, not as the government. as state representatives t

the two major candidates have outlined far different approaches to fostering economic development in new york. mr. cuomo has established targeted programs like the buffalo billion and start up new rk in ich he claims success while mr. astorino proposes lower taxes and a less regulatory climate will resort in even more success. what is your take on that? >> i think it is a very good question. i have had some experience with start up new york. i am not in favor of it. i think the idea of bringing companies and having a 10-year tax break is good news to me. but i have tried it with some company's i have worked with and it is difficult to deal with. it does not include a lot that it needs to include. so i am not a big fan of it. i have seen a lot of commercials lately. they have spent 200 million dollars in commercials. it sounds good but it is not working that well. i like the economic development idea. but i think we should do this as people of the state of new york, not as the government and the state representatives who are telling you what they are going to do, how they are going to do it, and t

as governor would try to foster those civic organizations trying to encourage them to get involved. >> moderator: thank you mrricketts. suzanne reisenberg with the next question. >> is the press is close mental health facilities in favor of more community care some law enforcement officials have claimed that their jails and prisons have become dumping grounds for those with mental illness. do you think that nebraska spends spent enough money on mental health issues? hassebrook: this is certainly one of issues i have heard about traveling around the state talking to law enforcement officials at with regard to issues with regard to people who need mental health care. also having to transport inmates to get mental health care can be something that takes a deputy all day. it doesn't appear in anybody's budget but it's expensive to the county and that puts pressure on taxes. it's one of the things we have to take a look at and your question is do we spend enough on a? i think this is not so much a question of do we spend enough but how are we spending the dollars and with regard to state government that is worth i

foster along with an inmate could be coming to an end. >> before we start as always we'll give it to our ceo, mr.. [ applause ] deputy vails is leaving for another job in the sheriff service. this is the last service he will supervise. unless another deputy volunteers to step in, the weekly gatherings will cease. >> i am taking all of you with me just like i did every night when i left. but i am leaving here -- what i am leaving here is the tools you have been given to make your lives better. some people would say these guys are monsters and animals. who cares what they have to say. i do. with everything bad that's ever happened in your life, you can always remember you can learn from it. it doesn't have to consume you. just move forward. that's my challenge to you. >> amen! >> congratulations! deputy vails says she helped start the group not out of religious calling but it's important to offer a positive experience to inmates most of whom will inevitably return to the community. >> my mother raised me to be catholic. in spite of all of her best efforts. i resisted. i don't really have a religion

mr. miller? >> i'm happy to take that question. we're very proud of our relationship we've fostered over the last couple years with the u.s. army in specific. memorandum of understanding that went back a couple years that covers a variety of different things. we've gotten current and retired players together with returning active service members to talk about cultural issues. what is it about football or what is it about the military that makes it very difficult for somebody to remove themselves from play or certainly in the case of military from a battle? we found a great deal of reticence on behalf of both populations, sort of a shared reticence to remove themselves from their comrades or teammates. it instills a question as to how you get somebody to tell their teammate or tell their colleague, hey, you don't look right, you should get off the field. so we've learned a lot from that. let me just add briefly, we meet regularly with the army to talk about the research they're doing from a scientific perspective. we share our agenda. we share the ideas we have. and they do with us as well. it's proven to be a very cooperat

mr. miller? >> i'm happy to take that question. we're very proud of our relationship we've fostered over the last couple years with the u.s. army in specific. memorandum of understanding that went back a couple years that covers a variety of different things. we've gotten current and retired players together with returning active service members to talk about cultural issues. what is it about football or what is it about the military that makes it very difficult for somebody to remove themselves from play or certainly in the case of military from a battle? we found a great deal of reticence on behalf of both populations, sort of a shared reticence to remove themselves from their comrades or teammates. it instills a question as to how you get somebody to tell their teammate or tell their colleague, hey, you don't look right, you should get off the field. so we've learned a lot from that. let me just add briefly, we meet regularly with the army to talk about the research they're doing from a scientific perspective. we share our agenda. we share the ideas we have. and they do with us as well. it's proven to be a very cooperat

mr. miller? >> i'm happy to take that question. we're very proud of our relationship we've fostered over the last couple years with the u.s. army in specific. memorandum of understanding that went back a couple years that covers a variety of different things. we've gotten current and retired players together with returning active service members to talk about cultural issues. what is it about football or what is it about the military that makes it very difficult for somebody to remove themselves from play or certainly in the case of military from a battle? we found a great deal of reticence on behalf of both populations, sort of a shared reticence to remove themselves from their comrades or teammates. it instills a question as to how you get somebody to tell their teammate or tell their colleague, hey, you don't look right, you should get off the field. so we've learned a lot from that. let me just add briefly, we meet regularly with the army to talk about the research they're doing from a scientific perspective. we share our agenda. we share the ideas we have. and they do with us as well. it's proven to be a very cooperat

mr. president. there's no love between these men. we all know that. that's been discussed at length. and netanyahu even within israel is viewed as a supremely difficult and annoying individual, at times the likud party fostered by being israel's annoying individual. they're on his side and seen as giving everyone a tough time, giving this president a tough time. i wonder if you can walk us through what's happened now, the personal difficulties between these men, i would argue are receding. matters more arguably for israel's security. >> first, it's hard to know exactly what's going on between the two. it may well be they've had six years together. while they don't particularly like each other, they've figured out how to work together. second, i think president obama does recognize -- >> i have to interrupt you momentarily. we have breaking news. nbc news learned director of the secret service julia pearson is announcing stepping down. pete williams, we've got you. what is the latest, pete? >> i guess that's not so much of a surprise. the only question was timing. we had been hearing all day that it was very likely that she would step down in the wake of these last two serious security breaches involving the

fostering of crony capitalism and corruption, and that has got to stop. >> thank you, sir. it is now time for rebuttals. we'll go in the same order. mr. rounds you have 30 serkts. >> thank you. the program was created in 1990. it has had bipartisan support. senator pressler then a member of the house, senator dashle while rick was a senior staffer with him. i believe senator johnson has been in favor of the program as well. the plan behind it is to allow for economic development similar to what canada did. to bring economic development into areas that wouldn't have had it. has it been good for us? yes. i believe it has. it's up for reauthorization in 2015. >> out of time. would you like a rebuttal? >> yes. and i'm having a little trouble figuring out which light is mine. there we go. thank you very much. well, governor rounds, i would dispute what you just said in terms of support for the program doesn't mean that we supported the corruption that came to surround it in south dakota. you can have a federal or state program. but what we're talking about is the death of mr. benda, the mysterious death of him and all the matters that surr

fosters women and promoting through training. before i bring it into focus and tell you some of what i want to get out of this conversation, let me first thank our host, mrs. obama, mrs. bush, the white house, the bush institute and the state department for hosting this important event, this wonderful event. our thanks to them and that thanks is on behalf of everyone here on the stage. so thank you. now, most of you have heard or read the headline africa rising. it's true, it is. when you look at the trend lines, when you look at the stats, most of you know that from 2000 to 2010, six of the ten fastest growing economies in the world were in africa. there have been immense strides made to get more children into school. those are health indicators. the needle is being moved in the right direction when it comes to child mortality. don't get me wlonrong, there's lot to do. we need to get more school gir school. so there's a lot to do. but africa is moving in the right direction, it's moving upwards. key to keeping that movement, keeping that momentum, africa's women. that's key to doing that. we know -- you have heard it said today, if you empower women, if