so we had our officers meeting with director ram, mr. frie, vice president wolfram and myself and environmental review officer sarah jones and this is exactly the subject. because on a broader spectrum that's that i felt and vice president wolfram has felt that this commission wants to meet product sponsor goals. we want to help them maximize their area. however wie -- we don't want to lose resources. specifically to commissioner pearlman, we keep seeing this either/or. oh, you are going to lose a whole tower if you have a preservation alternative. no. and i thought i explained this previously to this developer previously on a previous project. i don't care if it's a 5-foot set back, to me that's worth it. and seeing this where it's either we do two towers or we do one or we do one, wrong. we're happy to approve two towers, especially when i see retail spaces that would easily fit into the facade of oak street. the oak street one, i cannot believe we would lose that building. so i'm extremely frustrated. so we're going through and we're going