mr. gib ner, if you have language for us to add >> sure. just addressing dhr's, concern, i agree with mrs. johnson, that the catch-all exemption at the end might do the trick but to make sure everyone's on the same page and i think make dhr most comfortable with, we propose adding would reveal personnel information, not subject to disclosure, which i think would address that concern as one of the now, list of maybe five different bases to not list attendees, and meetings >> would reveal? >> woeld reveal personnel information not subject to disclosure after california government goad section 3504, would reveal personal information, subject to disclosure comma or disclosure under state or -- law. >> can we add that to the amendment? >> so moved >> i will take that without objection. then on the amendment of the whole supervisor tang? >> i made a motion to adopt the amendment as a whole as submitted >> okay we will take that without objection. and on what is the language you wanted to add? no? i think we're good. and on the motion to move forw