one thing about you, mr. gibbs that i know is you are good for your word. >> i thought it would get me back to new hampshire, i thought if you tell them, "we don't want mr. gibbs here," they have to take me back. >> they don't have to take you back. >> then i'll homicide one of your inmates! >> what they'll do-- let me finish-- is they'll make arrangements for you to go from here to another state. new jersey, maryland... >> new jersey's refused me rhode island's refused me because of my mental health issues. >> it seems to me that you'd like to see your wife and your two daughters. >> yes, that's the most important thing. >> it seems to me that you'd like get you back out in general population. what we're going to do... >> as long as somewhere down the road we can convince new hampshire, "mr. gibbs is doing unreal, he's changed," and maybe take me back. >> look, what i can control is "how do i move mr. gibbs out of the seg unit," okay? >> narrator: gibbs will have to prove he is no longer a threat before he's moved

mr. gibbsno longer a political contributor here at msnbc because of his new job at mcdonald's. >>> still ahead on "way too early." a big night of sports and a late one. if you're up now, chances are you missed the game. >>> giants pitcher with the first no-hitter of the season. we'll have those highlights and a check of the weather when "way too early" comes right back. across america people, like basketball hall of famer dominique wilkins, are taking charge of their type 2 diabetes... ...with non-insulin victoza. for a while, i took a pill to lower my blood sugar but it didn't get me to my goal. so i asked my doctor about victoza. he said victoza works differently than pills and comes in a pen. victoza is proven to lower blood sugar and a1c. it's taken once a day, any time. and the needle is thin. victoza is not for weight loss but it may help you lose some weight. victoza is an injectable prescription medicine that may improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and

my time has expired. >> thank you, mr. gibbs. miss edwards. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman, and thank you to the witnesses today. i know there's still a lot of facts and many questions we have to examine before we get real answers, but there's some things, and i want to follow up with miss norton's comments. on may 12th, my understanding, mr. pierce, is that the engineer who was operating was doing so under a new rule, under a new controversial work schedule that began on march 23rd of 2015, and that included shorter turnaround times on most runs that had happened before march 23rd. i guess i'm curious whether the union or workers were consulted prior to the the new work schedule as to what they believe the impact would be on them? >> yes. they have been. the unions are in discussion with amtrak about the scheduling of the workforce on the assignments that you're talking about. the assignments in place do not violate federal hours of service and they are not constricted by the current contract language. it's something the parties work out between themselves as the

mr. gibbs: h.r. 944, introduced by mr. lobiondo re-authorizes the national estuary program found in section 320 of the clean water act. estuaries are unique and highly productive waters that are important to ecological and economic basis of our nation. congress first authorized the national estuary program in 1987 with amendments to the clean water act to promote the protection of the significant water estuaries in the united states that are deemed to be threat understand by pollution, development or overuse. unlike many of the programs under the clean water act, the national estuary program is a nonregulatory program. instead it is designed to support a collaborative, voluntary effort of federal, state and local stakeholders to restore degraded estuaries. using consensus building in a collaborative decision process instead of a topdown regular approach the national estuary program has been effective as promoting locally-based involvement. in addition it leverages nonfederal money for restoration activities by providing fu

mr. gibbs. >> thank you mr. chairman. mr. boardman i'm confused. on the ptc we talked about this track, i think it was a conscious decision. first of all in your testimony you said on the southbound that was instituted. but on northbound it wasn't because i think i read a report that it was you said the speed maximum speed you can get up to was 80 miles an hour in your testimony. is that correct? >> no sir. >> no? >> it's not. it's not ptc. and it is not interrogation. it's a maximum allowed speed at 80 miles an hour. and the turnover speed on the corner is 98. >> i understand that. but i think i read in the report the reason it was on the southbound and ptc was implemented on the southbound -- >> i just want you to understand it's not positive train control. s in not positive train control that we're talking about here. it's automatic train control. it's just a major difference on how it operates. that's all. >> oh, okay. so automatic train control is on the southbound track? >> yes, sir. >> and not the northbound track. >> yes, sir. >> so when yo

mr. gibbs. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. boardman, i'm confused. on the ptc we talked about this track, i think it was a conscious decision. first of all in your testimony you said on the southbound that was instituted. but on northbound it wasn't because i think i read a report that it was you said the speed maximum speed you can get up to was 80 miles an hour in your testimony. is that correct? >> no, sir. >> no? >> it's not. it's not ptc. and it is not interrogation. it's a maximum allowed speed at 80 miles an hour. and the turnover speed on the corner is 98. >> i understand that. but i think i read in the report the reason it was on the southbound and ptc was implemented on the southbound -- >> i just want you to understand it's not positive train control. s in not positive train control that we're talking about here. it's automatic train control. it's just a major difference on how it operates. that's all. >> oh, ok. so automatic train control is on the southbound track? >> yes, sir. >> and not the northbound track. >> yes, sir. >> so when you

. >> thank you mr. gibbs. ms. edwards. >> thank you, mr. chairman.thank you to the witnesses today. i know there's still a lot of facts and many more questions we have to examine before we get the real answers. but i want to follow up with ms. norton's comments. on may 12, my understanding, mr. pearce the engineer who is operating system and so underrated under a new controversial work schedule that began march 23rd 2015 and not included shorter turnaround times on most runs that has happened in before march 23rd. so i guess i'm just curious as to whether the union or the workers have been consulted prior to the implementation of this new work schedule as to what they believe the impact would be on them. >> yes, they have been. the unions are in discussion about the scheduling of over worst on the assignments are talking about. the assignments as they are in as they replace them as i understand it do not violate federal hours of service and they are not restricted by the current contract language. it is something the parties work out between themselv

mr. gibbs: i remain skeptical of iran's commitment to disarmament and transparency. i believe there are five key issues that must be addressed for this to be a good deal for america and israel. one unrestricted access to inspection locations on short notice inspectors must be given complete access at any time, anyplace for verification inspections. two, iran must disclose in entirety its previous activities and efforts toward a nuclear weapon. three, sanctions must remain in place until iran complies and proves its compliance. and we must show commitment to a robust response and to any violation. four, any deal must be long-term and must not include development of any access to nuclear weapons. finally, any negotiations must include provisions that require iran to dismantle their program completely with no path to a weapon in the future. i believe that only if these conditions are met should congress and the american people even consider a deal with iran. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from washington seek recognition? with

mr. gibbs: two, to drive down costs we have to focus on market-oriented reforms like making coverage affordable across state lines and removing the individual and employer mandates. three, we have to incentivize the health savings accounts to pay for routine and individual care. ipab reform is the first step to returning the health care decisions to patients and their doctors. i yield back my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. gallego: the strength of our communities depends on the health and well-being of our families. unfortunately millions of families across our nation, are impacted by alzheimer's and dementia. june is alzheimer's and brain awareness month. it's my hope we can come together, republicans and democrats, and commit to give researchers the resources they need to combat alzheimer's and other diseases. but also to make sure pa