mr. gibner and john gibner, deputy city attorney just to give earlier mr. updyke was talking about the city surplus property ordinance and by ordinance through this legislation the board of supervisors can determine that this prompt is subject to the restrictions of the city property ordinance the oakland that was made reference supervisor mar involves a different but similar law that employees e applies to the city that mr. updyke said we've filed with the procedural steps under the property steps ordinance we're evaluating to what extent it statute applies here and if we determine that it does apply here the state surplus property will be sure to follow all the mandates. >> i think i'm following what is happening at oakland's and here could you explain the interpret trooen relationship between the selling of this site dynamic convinced we have to sell it how that intreendz with the gll site and where the various departments about go into that new site how this fits in. >> certainly as the board unanimously adapted last spring and fall your moving forward

mr. gibner >> john gibner. that is a policy decision for the board to consider perhaps with [inaudible] advice >> thank you. i'm very worried about subjecting a hand full of businesses to the law that we know full well they cannot comply with. aside from being bad policy that seems increasingly unfair and likely subject us to a law suit because of factors beyond their control, movie theaters will be out of compliance day 1. there are 7 movie theaters in the city subjected to the legislation. [inaudible] van nes theater, sin mark which ones in west field and [inaudible] empire and land mark theater who has the embarcadero center. collectorly they have about 257 employees at these threators and the legislation goes into effect the theaters will have to pay penalties on each one and the most likely outcome is they will lay off employees and we don't want to see that happen. this can hurt employees, not help employees. proposing a amendment to section 3300.g.4 b which i think we can do as a addition at the end of t

mr. gibner. so, mr. gibner, what is in our summary includes some of the amendments that were placed on a duplicateed file and sent to the planning commission. my understanding is based on actions that were taken monday those in the duplicated file but not the file we are voting on today? >> that is correct. there arethry different sets of amendments sent to the planning commission and one prohibits subdivision in the dwelling units so that the unit could be separately sold or financed from the existing building. one prohibiting dwelling units in building where sthr a ellis act eviction in the last 10 year jz the other prohibited shoret term rentals. all those amendments are considered in the planning commission in the next 90 days and come back. >> i want to thank supervisor wiener for picking this up. the adu is a topic that has come up with many years. i'm delighted to join supervisor wiener in trying to get our city to take a step in that direction. i'm supervisor of a district that struggles with how

mr. gibner would it be substantive. >> no. you make the amendment on tuesday and still pass it. >> so i will taylor reserve that for tuesday, i understand the challenges supervisor farrell statistics it i understand the changes the director is dealing with with the reality of the market although i'd like to see the final deal proposed before us i will make a motion to forward out this with a positive recommendation to the full board of supervisors. >> motion pie supervisor tang madam clerk a roll call vote. >> supervisor tang supervisor mar marry no supervisor farrell two i's one no. >> the motion >> okay. thank you everyone madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body? >> there's no further business. >> we're adjourned thanks. >> good morning san francisco. >> yeah. >> we want to wait for especially they're still hugging each other inside our great city hall. >> come on all out everyone before we begin i want to thank tom taylor and others for in rainbow flag thank you tom and gilbert (clapping) and

mr. gibner. so, mr. gibner, what is in our summary includes some of the amendments that were placed on a duplicateed file and sent to the planning commission. my understanding is based on actions that were taken monday those in the duplicated file but not the file we are voting on today? >> that is correct. there arethry different sets of amendments sent to the planning commission and one prohibits subdivision in the dwelling units so that the unit could be separately sold or financed from the existing building. one prohibiting dwelling units in building where sthr a ellis act eviction in the last 10 year jz the other prohibited shoret term rentals. all those amendments are considered in the planning commission in the next 90 days and come back. >> i want to thank supervisor wiener for picking this up. the adu is a topic that has come up with many years. i'm delighted to join supervisor wiener in trying to get our city to take a step in that direction. i'm supervisor of a district that struggles with how

mr. gibner staff was properly noticed in terms of the flying sunshine matter and an issue to putting that aside whether they in fact violated the sunshine ordinance by redacting this information and at this point as the second question staff had pretty much the same position as they do now but battery commissioner renne disagreed with that assessment that went back to the task force and it was vague as to exactly you know what was expected we didn't get another hearing they wrapped up and wrote some finding from our prospective we think that by this time it is a long time and everybody is on notice and know what's going on we recommend a finding on the merits and i think staffs position has not changed that is their is it is in fairness to what people say it doesn't could kr0r7d with what the city attorney said there's a right to privacy it is triggered with the right to address information and that sort of thing a transitions a balancing test that is the key to determination is, you know, the individuals right to privacy and what the releases of the information on the funning of governme

mr. city attorney can you walk you through to go into recess he also supervisor yee mentioned a separate item around a newspaper. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney i actually have 3 items i'm hoping you can read them supervisor yee excuse me. offend on amendment to item 11 the outreach advertising to add the sunset beacon and west portal monthly the ordinance that authorized that advertising defines the eligible perpetrator california's or frequent publications those two are monthly to my recommendation is it you resend that vote to for the record forwarding to the board of the committee report and then take another vote to move to the board committee report the original resolution with commissioner tang's amendment my office will work with supervisor yee to figure out what optimize for periodicals. >> i'll ged go forward. >> we'll take that without objection. and then the new amendment. >> through the chair i'd like to include the article and forward to other to the board an june 3rdrd. >> seconded by supervisor mar we'll take that without objection. >> number 2. >> is item 7 and 8 which were c ordinances amending the plan

attorney john gibner, the test for qual fiication doesn't turn on whether a particular counselrr is paid through dcyf funding it is are they employee who receives dcyf funding and it sounds here mr. zang isn't a employee but a consultant hired for a handful of hours for the organization so that isn't a conflict because he isn't a employee at the time if he is appointed in september. >> thank you for the clarification. >> there is something i want to acknowledge, when we think of early childhood education we think about women. i think naturally because of being mothers and stair typically being considered to be more of the nurtureing of the 2 genders, i am excited that both luis andiedy are interested serving. i know these gentlemen and they are excellent fathers and family men. i can support eddy at the time if it will bring consensus around this deliberation. i'm relucted to support in this role because i'm selfish skn want him to continue what he is doing in the bay view. he provided a fantastic service to not just bay view but also visitation valley and been a liaison connecting the youth around cultural awareness and bringing them to democratic process how local government a

attorney john gibner, the test for qual fiication doesn't turn on whether a particular counselrr is paid through dcyf funding it is are they employee who receives dcyf funding and it sounds here mr. zang isn't a employee but a consultant hired for a handful of hours for the organization so that isn't a conflict because he isn't a employee at the time if he is appointed in september. >> thank you for the clarification. >> there is something i want to acknowledge, when we think of early childhood education we think about women. i think naturally because of being mothers and stair typically being considered to be more of the nurtureing of the 2 genders, i am excited that both luis andiedy are interested serving. i know these gentlemen and they are excellent fathers and family men. i can support eddy at the time if it will bring consensus around this deliberation. i'm relucted to support in this role because i'm selfish skn want him to continue what he is doing in the bay view. he provided a fantastic service to not just bay view but also visitation valley and been a liaison connecting the youth around cultural awareness and bringing them to democratic process how local government a

attorney john gibner, the test for qual fiication doesn't turn on whether a particular counselrr is paid through dcyf funding it is are they employee who receives dcyf funding and it sounds here mr. zang isn't a employee but a consultant hired for a handful of hours for the organization so that isn't a conflict because he isn't a employee at the time if he is appointed in september. >> thank you for the clarification. >> there is something i want to acknowledge, when we think of early childhood education we think about women. i think naturally because of being mothers and stair typically being considered to be more of the nurtureing of the 2 genders, i am excited that both luis andiedy are interested serving. i know these gentlemen and they are excellent fathers and family men. i can support eddy at the time if it will bring consensus around this deliberation. i'm relucted to support in this role because i'm selfish skn want him to continue what he is doing in the bay view. he provided a fantastic service to not just bay view but also visitation valley and been a liaison connecting the youth around cultural awareness and bringing them to democratic process how local government a