mr. ginsberg called me last friday and advise me that based on some of the comments we had made in our report, he went back to the ortega family. that is when we first learned of the increase in the minimum guarantee. bacouif there was a higher amout potentially proposed by the current operator, was there a lower amount compared to the capital improvement. your concern was not the minimum annual at first. i believe that or take a's aspect was the $200,000 which they were able to do for capital improvements. >> to get into some of the selection process, the current operator proposed $23,000 in capital improvements at the site. as of last night, he warned me that he did not agree with that characterization that it was 23,000. i expressed some of those sentiments today. we reviewed his proposal, 23,000. furthermore, the documentation that was given to our commission on august 19th in advance of the commission hearings. this is the far right proposal of the corporation and it talks about the value of the proposed improvements being 23,000. this is public information. he has attended this. he was