mr. ginsburg >> good evening. i'm aaron are the rec and park department to speak on this item i'll be brief we urge you to adapt a represents for the staff report we fold the city attorney responding with the council they've included that the violation of law right to privacy was important and the disclosure of their personal information has not shed light into the departments partition of the wait list more broadly i'll say that we as the department we respect we have the right of the privacy for the residents and the members of the public we serve and we believe that it is essential to maintain the highest level of service so we urge you to find according and no violation of the sunshine ordinance occurred thank you. >> any other public comment? >> patrick shaw i was disturbed you were reaching a different findings than the commissioner my recollection of the testimony before the notification eir ethics commission by rec and park representatives was that they were just following the good government guide as comm

mr. ginsburg. >> in contract negotiations with for a in the amount of of '$75. >> members the committee here with the department admin deputy we made our presentation around the k rfq process we asked for a motion to authorize the clerk of the board to with enter into the negotiations to award the contract and declare the k radio to be the official radio of the board. >> supervisor mar. >> yes. thank you for work through this process i know that as we hear the board deliberations at i - urge our board meetings this is a great reestablishment where people can participant and be aware to the board of supervisors meeting i wanted to say over the years with the redevelopment agency this is a good process to start with our city to make sure that low income communities that loan to the 89 p.s. points 5 fm can be aware of what happens in the board of supervisors meetings my hope other processes will be available at some point in the future as well but from mined only for our tuesday board of supervisors meeting; is that right. >> that's correct supervisor mar the authorization for the board of supe

mr. ginsburg. >> i will say dito. i wanted to thank dawn and my team for staying at this for as along as they did. it took us a little while to reengage, but the end result is a better product. i wanted to thank the community, and i wanted to thank the developer and the legal team, and jeffrey for facilitating such a positive outcome. >> i want to thank commissioner low for his participation in the process and with that, we look forward to a very unique design and we'll be interested in the art that ends up there, too. i think it's a great idea. thank you all for making that presentation. >> we're now on item 10, which is general public comment continued from item 4. if there is any here who would like to make general public comment that did not comment on item 4, please come up. being no public comment, item 10 is through. item 11 is commissioners' matters. at this time, excuse me, this item is designed to allow commissioners to raise issues that they believe the commission should address at future meetings. there wi

mr. ginsburg esq.. this morning i want to talk about what they are spraying -- it's kind of like -- everything that has to do with the blue nile mosquito. so they are spraying the golf course and spraying the area around there. i just want to make sure that it's like the killer cocktail. that stuff is going to have another flyover with the helicopter -- recently there was a lawsuit. i believe that we have to keep it more or less preserved the way it is for the garter snake, the red-tail, amphibians and so forth. while they are still doing the methyl preen, is it going to extend to the parks in san francisco? so if we do have that, this stuff is not all that great. and it's got a terrible half-life to it. it lasts for a while. if you use this kind of stuff in your own home, i don't think you would really want it. you probably would be more cautious of using anti-mosquito spray. i wanted the department to be aware that shard park is one of three locations undergoing such type of preventative measures. so

mr. ginsburg is coming from. justice kennedy will deliver the fifth vote and go with the bride who brought you. some disadvantages highlighted by the amendments in this case. for example, a process which much of this sounds like it's much more controversial because unlike the equal protection clause does not clearly rooted in the marriage never mentioned reason a lot of rich original meaning that would support the same ruling here. they therefore got it down. chief justice robert ray says and celebrate the ghost of loughner, judicial pushes the way scalia decide what the majority is engaged in. i must say kennedy does say they take it very seriously. they are part of the rule of law in america. you apply them. it's very hard to deny this. 20 years ago i relied on the majority opinion as by using the marriage precedent in a very effectively. this would drive senators crazy. they argue the level of temporality anywhere that they are free to expand. what are the limits. is this not anti-democratic. to which this res

mr. clement points out, the legislature in both smiley and hildebrant remain the prime mover. and what he has objected to taking the legislature out of the picture entirely. >> yes, justice ginsburg. we can see that in neither case was the initiative power at issue. but that distinction was never made by the court either in hildebrant or smiley. and, in fact, smiley says we find no suggestion in the federal constitutional provision of an attempt to endow the legislature of the state with power to enact laws in a manner other than which in which the constitution of the state -- >> i'm not quibbling innocents about the case. the question in the case is not about the body. i mean, what's the body? everybody agreed it was the legislature. but when the legislature acts in this instance, is it acting as an electoral body? is it acting as a ratifying body? is it acting as a consenting body, as with acquisition of lands or is it acting as a legislative body? that's correct, that's the answer they give. >> the question is, are the people, by initiative a legislative body? are they the legislature is that they themselves have chosen? and in smiley, i can discuss in hildebrant this what the