0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it suddenly issued the average under laney, they say i'm gonna, let's do, mr. ginsburg. let's begin with the most important question for something we recently heard from you. you mentioned that as a result of the new vaccine or medication, melanomas, can dissolve and disappear. could you explain in simple terms for those of us who aren't doctors, how this is possible? studies. i'll try melanomas dissolved because the medication you're asking about and which will be discussing today. cancer vaccines based on m r n a technology act as a therapeutic treatment. these vaccines train the patients immune system to actively destroy malignant cells, meaning the tumor itself, the immune system achieves this by producing side to toxic lymphocytes in the body of the vaccinated patient. these lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell identify for and proteins, specifically known as anti gents or on the surface of tumor cells. the attached to the tumor cells or 2 or tissue and release a series of active enzymes contained in small vessels that there's some of these enzymes, grade holes i
it suddenly issued the average under laney, they say i'm gonna, let's do, mr. ginsburg. let's begin with the most important question for something we recently heard from you. you mentioned that as a result of the new vaccine or medication, melanomas, can dissolve and disappear. could you explain in simple terms for those of us who aren't doctors, how this is possible? studies. i'll try melanomas dissolved because the medication you're asking about and which will be discussing today. cancer...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
eventually be able to benefit from the vaccine. human trials are set to start next september, but mr. ginsburg is already confident, and that's another m r m. a base magazine will be just as successful as split next d, as most goal, is going by the a national center of everything. the ology and micro biology made quite a few headlines you really cold in 19 and to make when it's highly efficient, splitting the vaccine was administered to millions of people. this is a truly personalized product with the customized vaccine created for each patient. it is because of the fact that no 2 tumors are ever similar. but for this purpose, 1st of all, we need to identify these point mutations in each tumor for each patient. based on this, the medicine can be called personalized. then from these point mutations, we put together a construct called m r n a synthesize it and then package it in a little bit shell, which lets not go into detail. also represents some technical innovations and then injected into the body of the patient from home. this personalized data was obtained, the cost of the new vaccine cur
eventually be able to benefit from the vaccine. human trials are set to start next september, but mr. ginsburg is already confident, and that's another m r m. a base magazine will be just as successful as split next d, as most goal, is going by the a national center of everything. the ology and micro biology made quite a few headlines you really cold in 19 and to make when it's highly efficient, splitting the vaccine was administered to millions of people. this is a truly personalized product...
0
0.0
Dec 7, 2024
12/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. ginsburg: being subject to chinese control, it's a misfortune, perhaps, for the coan would have to and certainly comply with a requirement with respect to content information. mr. piusi don't think the government has takenned that yet anhan't seen what's in the confidential submissions and havet tablished it as chinese l b if they do, do these two justificationspply or is there a less restrictive means and it hasn't been decided. it was a questio even in holder that was an issue. >> let me make sure my colleagues don't have addit questions from you because we have to hear frousers and we'll give youuttle time, mr. pincus. thank you. mr. fisher? mr. fisher: may it please the court. the creator's fundamental submisonn this case is wholly independent for tiktok and the company's interests at play here, the a he directly implicates the firstmement rights of american speakers to speak, assocteand listen to free expression in this country. any other holding would prevent american writers fro publishing in politico or al jazeera or otify or filmmakers, american filmke to create documentaries
mr. ginsburg: being subject to chinese control, it's a misfortune, perhaps, for the coan would have to and certainly comply with a requirement with respect to content information. mr. piusi don't think the government has takenned that yet anhan't seen what's in the confidential submissions and havet tablished it as chinese l b if they do, do these two justificationspply or is there a less restrictive means and it hasn't been decided. it was a questio even in holder that was an issue. >>...
0
0.0
Dec 6, 2024
12/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. fisher: i think there wou be standing there for the injury but ihink that would be a -- [indiscernible] -- judge ginsburg: ok, fair enough. mr. fisher: but also, just remember, even if it were not direct as i've described, you look at the impractical opatn how the burden exists under the act and our speech is being silence so we satisfy that. you ask aut the covert nature of the alleged manipulation. and how a disclaimer might work. let me say a couple of things about that. one is,ust an odd argument to say that editor and publisher can be suppressed or people can bned from working there because they might consult or be controlled by other third parties. publishe in this country every day speak to u.s. government offialand any number of other third parties to make their publication disns. and that's never disclosed to the public and let alone even e altogether stierms. so -- sometimes. so it's an -- authors sometimes. so it's anddrgument. you asked what a disclosure might look like. the government could issue its own wain or as the company suggest, l surgeon general warning on the platform itself. from t
mr. fisher: i think there wou be standing there for the injury but ihink that would be a -- [indiscernible] -- judge ginsburg: ok, fair enough. mr. fisher: but also, just remember, even if it were not direct as i've described, you look at the impractical opatn how the burden exists under the act and our speech is being silence so we satisfy that. you ask aut the covert nature of the alleged manipulation. and how a disclaimer might work. let me say a couple of things about that. one is,ust an...