mr. goebel, would it be okay if we continued this to the next meeting? okay. let's take public comment on item number seven. >> i want to talk about current events. i spoke up and demonstrated that 144 unit apartment building complex can be built in the embarcadero for $66 million, and a 66 unit apartment complex can be built for $57 million. i demonstrated that 9 times 3 is 27 and each of these building is 27 stories tall. you get more bang for your buck building a 27 story apartment complex side by side with each of these two buildings which is already being built in mountain view and san mateo. you take a chunk of about 1,900 homeless people off the street by using this technique. and by using that technique, the homeless rate would decrease, and if you apply it to each and every location you want to build a navigation center, you'd have a less amount of people on the streets. sf viewer, please. will you freeze my time? >> chair fewer: mr. wright, would you mind if we continued your public comment -- >> i'll tell you what? i'll just demonstrate the document

mr. goebel? >> commissioner goebel: thank you, madam chair.your suggestion earlier this year, the lafco partnered with the urban affairs program at the university of san francisco to assist with our study in emerging items. today, the professor and the students -- at least about half of the class is here today to present their findings, and i would like to thank all of them for their hard work on this report. i also want to let you know that i will continue to work with them and also do further research based on their findings. there work is already proving valuable and helpful to our survey team and to the overall study. with that, i would like to introduce professor diana nigrin. >> thank you so much for having us? i'm not going to say too much but introduce these lovely students. they worked in four teams to research a different series of aspects. the students are going to layout the methodology and some of their findings, but you will be able to see the detail in the report that we prepared, which you all have. we'd be happy to answer any

mr. goebel, please continue. >> thank you, madam chair. commissioners, i'm very excited to reports that we have chosen it winning bidder for our survey of on-demand workers in san francisco, and i have sent each of you and your staff a copy of the proposal. first little background of how we arrived to today. we originally issued a request for proposals in january, and extended the deadline to the end of march. i did outreach to a number of organizations who have experience in this area, and though i hoped we would ultimately get multiple proposals, in the end we received only one, but it was a strong one that exceeded expectations. because we only received the one proposal, i served as a sole r.f.p. evaluator, and examined it based on its merits on the criteria outlined in the r.f.p. it scored high in the proposal and the interview evaluations, and last week i announced we had -- we tend to wear the contract to a group of economic economic researchers he will form a unique partnership with community organizers, the survey will be designed