mr. goldstein. >> mr. chief justice, may it please the court. we ask the court to hold that the city does not need to go to the judge in advance and get a warrant but instead that it merely needs to issue us a one-page subpoena. we can object to that subpoena but it's going to be enforced unless the city isn't actually implementing a legitimate administrative scheme because it's searching to harass us or investigate crimes. >> is it your position that there is no instance in which this statute and the implementation of it would be constitutional? >> it is because the hypothesis that you would use it for exigent circumstances or when you waive the right to privacy, don't actually involve the enforcment of the statute. what's necessary here, the value in the fourth amendment, is the requirement that there be a regularized scheme. it's going to be a regularized scheme that either appears in the administrative rule itself. that doesn't exists here. there's no limit on when they can search. how often they can search. or the reason they can search. if

mr. goldstein mentioned only one of them. so, for example, where the hotel is required to upload the records to the police department every day it may not even did a search, but it's certainly less intrusive. >> that's not the statute. i don't understand those examples because some of those examples, the police put out what out of this. >> not that one your honor. justice kennedy, not that one. in some of them the ordinance as the purpose of requiring someone to do something that they would not otherwise have to submit to. but the one that i just gave as an example the scenario of uploading the document rather than the police conducting a search on the spot is less intrusive. the problem here is that the plaintiffs have tried to invalidate every possible application of this ordinance but i haven't done the intrusiveness, privacy government interest of balance that one needs to do for each of them. up at me then circled to the meritsmarriage because -- >> i'm still very confused about this. there is always a potential exceptio

mr. clerk any other business before this commission. >> no other business before this commission today and thank you very much we're adjourned . >> cynthia goldsteinwelcome to the board of supervisors budget & finance committee dumb my name is it supervisor farrell i'll be chairing and joined by supervisor tang and supervisor yee and supervisor mar and supervisor wiener want to thank the clerk andrea ashbury as well as the members of sfgovtv jessie larson and charles kremenak that madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes.

mr. clerk any other business before this commission. >> no other business before this commission today and thank you very much we're adjourned . >> cynthia goldstein welcome to the board of supervisors budget & finance committee dumb my name is it supervisor farrell i'll be chairing and joined by supervisor tang and supervisor yee and supervisor mar and supervisor wiener want to thank the clerk andrea ashbury as well as the members of sfgovtv jessie larson and charles kremenak that madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the gin 16 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> okay. thank you very much so colleagues, we're to go in and out of order to get authorize those items items 4 to 7 quick prelim all item 4 for the jury room appropriation pro appropriate all receipts and expenditures for the city and county of san francisco as of june 2017 area item 5 the proposed sdprirm annual owners and positions if the annual appropriations ordinances for john 2016 to 2017 and item 16 the interim budget for the treasure i

mr. fung and bobby wilson. at the controls is victor pacheco the boards legal assistant and i'm cynthia goldstein. we have corey tieg. the assistant zoning administrator and representing the planning department and planning commission. we should be joined shortly by mr. duffy represented by inspection and department bureau management for the department of public works. bureau and street mapping. at this time, mr. pacheco if you can conduct the meeting guidelines. city clerk: the board request that you turn off all cell phones and pagers to not disrupt the proceedings. appellants, permit holders and department representative have 10 minutes to present their cases and 10 minutes for rebuttals. people representing must complete their comments within 10-minute period. to assist the board in the accurate representation of minutes, speakers are asked to submit a speaker card when you come to the podium. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. the board also welcomes your comments and suggestions. if you have questions about requesting a rehearing and board rules, please speak