mr. gonzalez, i want to go to you, i'm calling mr. gonzalez, because you're both named tony.ou are here to talk about the new digital platform. what else will you do? is this your last year? besides this app forfeitness, what are you going to do? >> i am 100% year this is my last year of playing football. but as far as going forward, yeah, it's not just fit start i'm doing. you have to go out there. you have to do other stuff to be passionate about, you can do every single day. one thing i love is football. i've been doing it my whole life. i can transition and sit at the desk, talk about the game i love. i've been playing it the last 17 years after next year. that's the next step. hopefully some network out there wants to hire me. >> tyler, am i really obvious, when i say he's obviously handsome enough to be a tv commentator about football. >> i would say absolutely. >> thank you, tyler. you're the best. >> anytime tony -- either tony, you want to come in at cnbc and talk business or football, we'd be delighted to have you. it's great to have you both with us. thank you for

mr. gonzalez, thanks for being here. >> it's good to be with you, allison. >> what did you think this weekhen you heard the department of justice set up this online tipline that sounds like it's trying to unearth some more dirt on george zimmerman? >> well, the first thing i thought of was that they're sort of at a dead-end. what they're doing now is doing what they can to see if there's any out there that is willing to come forward with some information that may form the basis of a civil rights prosecution. obviously, george zimmerman has been acquitted. he has been acquitted of the state charges. the question now is whether or not there are federal charges, civil rights violations that the department of justice can bring against george zimmerman against trayvon martin. >> is this standard procedure from the department of justice or are we seeing something different because of the outcry? >> i'm not sure there's anything standard. a very unusual high profile case that captured the interest of the nation. i think the department of justice, attorney general understands whatever they do, wha

mr. chairman, a poll jies but the minimumization exception for criminal investigation and when i asked the attorney general gonzalez about what you could use this information for, he specifically indicated criminal g-2c under minimumization requirements procedures. he specifically said you could run a criminal investigation without the necessity implying without the necessity of probable cause that you usually need to do to get information. thank you mr. chairman. let me start by saying i'm satisfied at least from what limited knowledge i have that the motivation behind this was legitimate and necessary for our national security to start establishment he of a court. and from your testimony you've apparently not abused individual rights and you have been an effective tool for terrorism. but my concern is this could evolve into something that is quite different. the star chamber in england started out as a very good and very popular with the people. it allowed people to get justice that otherwise would not. but it evolved over time into a powerful weapon for political retribution by the king. and my question is, in f