mr. goodman. around mr. goodman.

mr. goodman -- but mr. iece of evidence that would ensure that the company would lose the case, because indeed the interception in question was on behalf of the company. that was the information i was given. >> did you ask, "and who the hell else has this glenn mulcaire been hacking"? >> i do not believe so. i think it was known at the time that this was a voicemail interception that had already been prosecuted by the police. the police had said, "there isn't anything more here", and they had shut their investigation and successfully prosecuted the individuals concerned. >> i have got this growly australian accent rattling around in my head at the moment, who would then go on to say, "and how much more is this glenn mulcaire going to cost me?" do you think your dad might have asked more questions than you? >> i couldn't begin to speculate. >> and it did not occur to you to ask whether glenn mulcaire was doing this off his own bat, and who else was authorizing it. >> no, it >> no, it was definitely specifical

mr. goodman and the entire employment of mr. demint and arrest and -- of mr. goodman and arrest and conviction all predated my presence in the company. i had no discussion with him about it. >> did you ask? >> did i ask about the good winslet in particular? >> yes. >> no, i did not. >> [unintelligible] >> it was some time before i joined the matters affecting mr. goodman. the arrest and the convictions were well over a year before. there's no reason at the time to believe that there was anything other than a settled matter that was in the past. >> there was a significant amount of money for future discrepancies. you do not think it is proper to make sure that did not happen again? >> at the time, certainly, the company relied on assertions that internal investigations had occurred and that two people had been successfully prosecuted and went to jail and so on and so forth. i think it was seen as a matter that was in the past and that accountability had been delivered and the police had successfully prosecuted and closed the case. so there was no prompt or reaso

mr. goodman, but mr. goodlatte i don't live was discussed at the meeting. and that there was a piece of evidence that would ensure that the company would lose the case because indeed the interception in question was only half of the company. that was information i was given spirit did not occur to you, did you ask? >> i don't believe so. i think it was known at the time that this was a voicemail interception that had already been prosecuted by the police and that the police had said there isn't anything more here. they shut their investigation and successfully prosecute the individuals concerned. >> i have a growly australian accent rattling around in my head at the moment that would take how much more is this person going to cost me question to you think your dad might've asked more questions than you asked for? >> i couldn't begin to speculate. >> and you didn't come it didn't occur to you to sort of ask whether glenn mulcaire -- >> no, it was specifically said to me that he was doing this on behalf of the "news of the world" with respect to this. and tha

mr. goodman, but mr. goodlatte i don't live was discussed at the meeting. and that there was a piece of evidence that would ensure that the company would lose the case because indeed the interception in question was only half of the company. that was information i was given spirit did not occur to you, did you ask? >> i don't believe so. i think it was known at the time that this was a voicemail interception that had already been prosecuted by the police and that the police had said there isn't anything more here. they shut their investigation and successfully prosecute the individualsconcerned. >> i have a growly australian accent rattling around in my head at the moment that would take how much more is this person going to cost me question to you think your dad might've asked more questions than you asked for? >> i couldn't begin to speculate. >> and you didn't come it didn't occur to you to sort of ask whether glenn mulcaire -- >> no, it was specifically said to me that he was doingthis on behalf of the "news of the world" with respect to this. and that

mr. goodman, but mr. goodlatte i don't live was discussed at the meeting. and that there was a piece of evidence that would ensure that the company would lose the case because indeed the interception in question was only half of the company. that was information i was given spirit did not occur to you, did you ask? >> i don't believe so. i think it was known at the time that this was a voicemail interception that had already been prosecuted by the police and that the police had said there isn't anything more here. they shut their investigation and successfully prosecute the individuals concerned. >> i have a growly australian accent rattling around in my head at the moment that would take how much more is this person going to cost me question to you think your dad might've asked more questions than you asked for? >> i couldn't begin to speculate. >> and you didn't come it didn't occur to you to sort of ask whether glenn mulcaire -- >> no, it was specifically said to me that he was doing this on behalf of the "news of the world" with respect to this. and tha

goodman. >> thank you, mr. speaker.he chancellor of the exchequer ended his speech by talking about quack doctors, and, of course, in the book george's marvelous medicine, george makes a medicine for his grandmother to shrink her. can't the chancellor understand that he will not grow the british economy by cutting tax credits which will make it uneconomic for many women to go out to work? >> well, as i say, we're not cutting past credits, we're updating the -- [inaudible] and she should have listen today what i had to say. >> claire perry. [laughter] >> i am confused, mr. speaker. on page 82 it says the obr has cut its forecast for european -- [inaudible] on another page it says it has cut british forecast to .7%. the chancellor's economic theory, interest rates should be higher in britain than in the neurozone. they're not. can he explain why? >> because we have credibility. he was earned credibility for the assumption. that's what this government has done. it has not been an easy thing to do, but it has brought our fo