the communist leader of soviets russia i once said that we will overcome america then mr gorbachev also said you remember we should pilfer as we should develop technologies now mr putin was more modest remember he said that we should reach the level of portugal like catch up with europe but these slogans are introduced but we're still as you said. a moving falling ice the level to what's the problem when will or should a breakthrough happen. because all of us know soviet union economy. was able to produce some great scientific results why the space program. the nuclear program built puddle military high tech military here ok yeah aircraft yeah. but if you will remind yourself some kind of the technology to which human from the soviet union economy which was which may be applied for the ordinary people because you consume nothing which you love the g d t v you are a car store radio or anything that's sort of nothing so in the soviet union there what does it mean mean that there was a some kind of big drought scientific background to hold tickled the ground or the quantum itself could not

mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall. he says he would veto any deaths a plan without new resources -- new sources of revenue. republicans say that he is waging class warfare. is he right? >> he is right that the rich are getting too rich and the poor are getting poor. however, this is just what we need, or partisanship. washington has become what the voters think it is, just politics and nothing else. >> class warfare, nina? >> this is a policy difference and this is an election year. this president will not get reelected unless he can define himself in a way that voters will approve the. at the moment, they did not approve of his performance. he has got to do something different, go back to the old obama, or be more harry truman. >> class warfare, charles? >> it certainly is from the policy. he pretends he has a jobs plan and a debt plan, but you could tax warren buffett, you could confiscate everything that every billionaire owns and america, but it would not make a dent on the debt. it is the difference about liberals

trust you know a partner here look mr churchill mr carter of course they're right and the remember mr gorbachev twenty years ago when he was assured by george bush father that nato would never try to take over the countries from the iran curtain it was never posed there extract to the emerging russian see what happened and gorbachev has been talking about this endlessly for the past twenty years of course you cannot trust the pentagon and nato nato now is. i would say is the global ruble caught their weaponized arm of the you literally mice but you went then in they can go anywhere they can go to central asia afghanistan they can go to north in africa in libya they might go to the mideast they ran into the eleventh in syria and john mccain ended neo cons in us are saying look one day we don't intervene in china as well this is not exactly wishful thinking this is what's behind what we learned a few hours ago that the missile shield is going to be deployed in poland in romania and perhaps soon enough in two or three years turkey as well which is a very close our right to russia so nato is encirc

trust you know a partner here look at mr churchill mr glover of course they are right and remember mr gorbachev twenty years ago when he was assured by george bush father that nato would never try to take over their countries from the iron curtain they were never told their extract so the emerging russian see what happened and gorbachev has been talking about this endlessly for the past when the of course you cannot trust the pentagon and nato need to and now. i would say is the global robot got. what's on my arm of the you leave interest in my eyes but you well then they can go anywhere they can go to central asia afghanistan they can go to northern africa in libya they might go to the mediterranean for the live guns in syria and then john mccain and a neo cons in the us or say look one day we don't intervene in china's well this is not exactly wishful thinking this is what's behind what we learned a few hours ago that the mid-south shield is going to be deployed in poland soon in romania and perhaps soon enough in just three years in parity as well which is a very close ally to russia so natu

mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall." >> mr. boehner, mr. mcconnell, help us rebuild this bridge.elp us rebuild america. help us put construction workers back to work. pass this bill. let's pass the bill. >> cincinnati, i have a crush on you. i'm telling you. president obama continuing his national barnstorming for his jobs bill today. symbolically putting the top republicans in congress on the spot for where he chose to give the speech today. and it's worth noting that for all the consternation in the beltway press, in the pundit class, for president obama being confrontational with republicans about what it is he wants, for all the speculation that the president isn't really like this and he's just doing these sorts of speeches and taking this sort of tack on this issue because he's being forced to politically, for all of that beltway noise it is worth noting that when you see the president out on the speech giving these kinds of speeches he kind of seems to be enjoying himself these days. >> the idea for a big boost in construction is supported by the afl-cio, but it's also sup

mr. gorbachev, that made the difference. so we were hosting at camp lejeune.amongst other things, he asked one of our corporals. he said, what do you think about the russians being here and what do you think about that? what you think think we are here? and the corporal looked him in the eye and said, i don't know why you are here, marshall. but it sounds like a pretty good idea. and with the corporal meant of course is that it's far better to talk and negotiate than it is running around saying you're going to do this and do that. i'm never going to get anywhere but the latter. you may or may not be successful with the former, but it's worth a try and it's obvious to me this is a very complex issue of course as we all know. but i personally think that it has to be solved through negotiations by israelis and palestinians in order to work. i don't see any other way to do it in the worst thing about what to be a third and fourth parties representing themselves. thank you all very much. [applause] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] salamat the u.n

mr. gorbachev, that made the difference. we were hosting him and among other things he said, he asked one of our corporals. he said, what do you think about russians being here? what do think? why do you think we're here? the corporal looked him in the eye and said, i do not know why you're here but it sounds like a good idea. what's the corporal meant was that it is a far better to talk and negotiate then run around saying you're going to do this and do that. you will never get anywhere with the latter. you may not be successful with the former but it is worth a hell of a tribe. it is obvious this is a complex issue as we all know. i personally think that it hasted the soft through -- has to be solved through the palestinians to work. the worst thing would have third and fourth parties. thank you very much. >> the united nations security council meets this morning to consider the palestinian statehood and full membership in the u.n. a number of countries have expressed support for the measure. a formal vote is not expected

mr. gorbachev, that made the difference.and so we were hosting him at camp lejeune and amongst other things he said -- he asked one of our corporals -- he said, what do you think about we russians being here and what do you think about that? and why do you think we're here? and the corporal said -- looked him in the eye and said, i don't know why you're here, marshal, but it sounds like a pretty good idea. and what the corporal meant, of course, is that you got -- it's far better to talk and negotiate than it is running around saying you're going to do this and do that. you're never going to get anywhere with a ladder. you may or may not be successful with the former but it's worth a hell of a try and it's obvious to me that this is a very complex issue, of course, as we all know. but i personally think that it has to be solved through negotiations by the israelis and the palestinians in order to work. i don't see any other way to do it. and the worst thing of all would be to have third and fourth parties representing them.

mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall and then he turned his back on us, openly supporting the apartheid regimeuring his policy of construction -- constructive engagement. we see the same thing with the republican party. historical you have always been hostile to freedom movements around the world. historically. 1960's and the civil rights movement, their presidential candidate voted against the civil rights act, barry goldwater, and now -- and now they are trying to claim credit for it. it is very unfortunate. listening to rick perry two days ago made my stomach turn. and that guy wants to be president of the united states. unfortunate. it sickens me. it is unfortunate. host: let us get the thoughts from our guests. congressman, one of the things the caller may be talking about is gov. rick perry of using the pat -- president of a policy of appeasement the other day when it comes to the palestinians. guest: relative to that, i can't necessarily speak for the presidential candidates. you will see a lot of rhetoric that it on both sides and the people have to ultimately see through that and make