mr. guthrie will vote yes on h.r. 1155. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> as the member designated by mr. cuellar rise? >> as the member designated by mr. cuellar, i inform the house that mr. cuellar will vote yes. mr. green: i inform the house that mr. hice will vote yes on h.r. 1155. >> as the member designated by i inform the house that mr. demmings will vote yes. as mr. crist will vote yes on h.r. 1155. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> smeght mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. 1155, >> as the member designated by mrs. lawrence, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on h.r. 1155. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? mr. beyer: as the member designated by mr. smith, i inform the house that mr. smith will vote yes. as the member designated by mr. gomez, i inform the house that mr. gomez will vote yes on h.r. 1155. the speaker pro tem

mr. guthrie: i continue to reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new jersey is recognized. mr. pallone: i have no additional speakers and i'm prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from -- mr. guthrie: i'm prepared to close. this is important bill, i can't imagine what autumn's mother has gone through, what so many families have gone through with the stillbirth of their child. i urge my colleagues to vote for this bill and yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new jersey is recognized. mr. pallone: i urge support for this critical legislation and i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h.r. 5487 as amended. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, 2/3 being in the affirmative -- the gentleman from texas is recognized. >> i request the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3-s of house resolution 8, the yeas

mr. guthrie of kentucky, mr. guthrie will vote no on the previous question the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. nunes of california, i inform the house that mr. nunes will vote no on the previous question. as the member designated by mr. calvert of california, i inform the house that mr. calvert will no on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by member joe wills son of south carolina, mr.~wilson will vote nay on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from delaware seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. degette of colorado and mrs. beatty of ohio, i inform the house that ms. degette and mrs. beatty will vote yes on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? as the member designated by mrs.

mr. guthrie from kentucky, i inform the house that mr. guthrie will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on house resolution 848. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from nebraska rise? >> as the member designated by mr. dough lamb born from colorado, i inform the house that mr. lamb born will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from missouri rise? >> as the member designated by ms. ocasio-cortez, i inform the house that ms. cortez will vote yes on h.res. 848. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. bilirakis of florida, i inform the house that mr. bilirakis will vote nay on the rule. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. palazzo of mississippi, i inform the house that mr. palazzo will vote nay on the rule. mr. speaker, as the

mr. guthrie of kentucky, i inform the house that mr. guthrie will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? mrs. miller: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. lesko of arizona, i inform the house that mrs. lesko will vote no on amendment number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? mr. johnson: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. donald payne, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on amendment en bloc number 1. and as the member designated by mr. albio sires, as the member designated by -- i inform the house that mr. sires will vote yes on amendment en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose

mr. guthrie, our ranking member, for his five minutes of questions. >> thank you so much. and i appreciate all of y'all for being here. i'm still stressed that doj chose not to be here. in september i had an opportunity to host law enforcement round tables, kentucky's attorney general daniel cameroon was with us, i think dea had -- dr. gupta, i met with him the other day, i know you're not -- mr. chester, i met with dr. gupta the other day, i was encouraged by the enthusiasm he brings to the job and i look forward to fighting the plague against us. the biden administration's recent proposal doesn't impose mandatory minimums for trafficking these deadly substances. there's debate about what we should do about mandatory minimums but eliminating or not applying mandatory minimums to the scheduling of the analogues. does the biden administration have data or other relevant research it can share with members of this committee that suggest excluding mandatory minimums will lead to less fentanyl and fentanyl-related substances on our streets? >> thank you for the question, congre

mr. guthrie, our ranking member, for his five minutes of questions. >> thank you so much. and i appreciate all of y'all for being here. i'm still stressed that doj chose not to be here. in september i had an opportunity to host law enforcement round tables, kentucky's attorney general daniel cameroon was with us, i think dea had -- dr. gupta, i met with him the other day, i know you're not -- mr. chester, i met with dr. gupta the other day, i was encouraged by the enthusiasm he brings to the job and i look forward to fighting the plague against us. the biden administration's recent proposal doesn't impose mandatory minimums for trafficking these deadly substances. there's debate about what we should do about mandatory minimums but eliminating or not applying mandatory minimums to the scheduling of the analogues. does the biden administration have data or other relevant research it can share with members of this committee that suggest excluding mandatory minimums will lead to less fentanyl and fentanyl-related substances on our streets? >> thank you for the question, congre

mr. guthrie from kentucky, i inform the house that mr. guthrie will vote no on h.r. 5314. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? ms. brownley: as the member designated by ms. bass of california, i inform the house that ms. bass will vote yes on h.r. 5314. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. garr been a doctor mr. barragan, i inform the house that mr. barragan will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. garamendi of california, i inform the house that mr. garamendi will vote yes on h.r. 5314. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. posey, i inform the house that mr. posey will vote nay on h.r. 5314. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. veasey, i i

mr. trump continued to a rally, met with gold star families and hosted a covid briefing weeks later repeatedly pressed by savannah guthrie, mr. trump denied testing positive before the debate. >> did you test the day of the debate? >> i don't know. i don't even remember. i think it was thursday evening, maybe even late thursday evening, i tested positive. that's when i first found out about it. >> reporter: president biden today dismissed a question about whether his rival put him at risk. >> i don't think about the former president. >> reporter: tonight in a statement mr. trump said the story that he had covid before or during the first debate was fake news, but he didn't address whether he received a positive test. lester >> peter alexander, thank you. >>> in beverly hills police are searching for suspects in the home invasion that left the wife of a music legend dead. 81-year-old philanthropist jacqueline avant was fatally shot inside her home overnight avant is the wife of clarence avant, known as the godfather of black music, also the mother-in-law of netflix ceo ted sarandose. police are asking anyone with any info

mr. guthrie. >> thank you and i appreciate the witnesses being near. i know it has been a long day and i appreciate you being here. i have a concern. as i said earlier today, when i talked to the republican leader, a real concern about opioid addiction, opioid sales, enabling the opioid trade, and the sale of opioids on social media platforms has skyrocketed. in many cases, law enforcement shares information or leads with platforms to take down this content, but those calls sometimes go unheeded. so for you or anyone who has time to answer this, my question is first to you. can you explain which sections of section 230 provide immunity for platforms when they know a specific instances where this content is on their platform and don't take action to remove it? and if so, would you recommend modifying section 230 two address this issue? how would you balance the need for accountability while fostering the platform's ability to remove this content? i can repeat any of that if you need me to. >> sure. so i did not think section 230 needs to be modified lig

mr. guthrie. rep. guthrie: we are all concerned about misinformation and we do not want misinformation spread. the question is how do you define misinformation and who gets to find -- to define it. first i want to set up the christmas -- the question and you set up earlier with the wuhan lab. i am the ranking member of the health subcommittee and we been looking into the wuhan lab. this is a real scenario of information getting blocked from facebook, and it goes to some of the comments and i have documentation here. if you go back to the april 17 white house press briefing someone asked the president and i wanted to ask dr. fauci can you address section -- concerns that the virus is man-made and came out of a laboratory in china. dr. fauci says there was a study that we can make available where a group of highly qualified love -- evolutionary biologist looks at the sequences and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now totally consistent with the jump of a species from animal to h