mr. lamon gwynn. he shared his story with me so others would know how this program needed to change, so other veterans would bicht and he decided after a year of dealing with the v.a. sumly to give up on choice. i don't want to let that happen. i don't want veterans to give up on choice. i don't want the department of veterans fairs to have the excuse to say choice is not a valuable program. veterans don't like it and come back to congress and tell us that it's no longer needed. if i was home in kansas, i'd explain it this way. again, my hometown, plainville, population now 1,900, used to have rail service. over time the rail service diminished and became less effective, the rates went up and fewer people used the rail service, the railroad to haul grain, in particular. then the railroad could go to the regulators and say, hey, nobody is using the railroad. can we just abandon it? and i worry that that kind of attitude and approach could happen with this issue if we don't make certain that our veteran