mr. hacker. >> abougood evening. i am harvey hacker, project architect. i will give you a little background on what this building is. it was one of a string of industrial buildings in the dogpatch area that were operated for various purposes by the clothing manufacturer espri. it went through different owners and ended up being owned by jen oliver, the present issue. there are two sets of permits at issue here. first is the use of the property and whether the interior remodel application should have been reviewed by the planning department. i would like to take that off of consideration because of business relations between the tenant that that work was being done for and the building owner. that permit is going to be withdrawn and it is simply not a question so i believe that moots any questions related to it. but the second thing is for new openings in the property line wall to the adjacent lot. the story behind that is a developer has under construction a multi-unit housing project on the adjacent lot which includes as part of his approved plans a 30-f

mr. hacker. >> thank you. i just want to add a few details to the correct description mr. sanchez gave. the permit was -- i'm not sure i remember the exact dates right. we received a signed off permit in february. the reason it was not pulled, the reason the contractor didn't come in to pay the fee until april, was that upon approval of the permit it was only at that time that i was able to advise the property owner to solace it is birds, select the -- solicits biddings, select the contractor and when he was ready to roll he would incur the cost for the permits which is quite the usual procedure for over-the-counter approvals. so that for all of that time we were confident in th the legitiy of the permit and acted accordingly. i understand that of course the planning department doesn't have the authority to waive any of the normal requirements, which is exactly why we are in front of the board of appeals to ask you to consider the unusual circumstances we are in right now. the present application for certificate of appropriateness turns out that once you start to do it, there are a lot

mr. robot, but it's not hackers stealing more than $40 million worth of bitcoin from one of the world's largestcurrency exchanges. the crypto criminals made off with 7,000 bit coins from finance. they used a variety of methods to break in. now, if you have coins with binance don't panic. the exchange says it will cover the losses in full the hack comes after recent bitcoin rally. look at that chart bitcoin, if you haven't been paying attention, up nearly 10%? just the past week switch now back to the trade story and the showdown with china. if tariffs are jacked up on friday to 25% from 10% on $200 million worth of goods, in retailers are going to feel that pain some are going to feel more pain than others. morgan stanley put out a list of retailers whose earnings could be negatively impacted the most by a jump in tariffs now, some of the big names on that list? costco and michael's according to morgue app stanley, they could see a 9% hit for their earnings per share b.j.'s wholesale, william sonoma and dick's sporting goods, they could see, look that the, double digit. 12,%, 16%. it gets worse

. >> good afternoon, commissioners i am harvey hacker, i am the project architect. i don't have anything to add to mr. christianson's clear report, except to tell you that i have the building owner and the industrial agriculture tenant also here, so if you have questions for any of the three of us, we are prepared to answer them. heavy utility use versus the building department which they'll route it to p.u.c. for water and a couple of things on title 24 but not in terms of anything related to t.v. panels for solar because they use a lot of juice for these uses. >> we are use much more power and a lot more water. it's not something that we have regulations to rely on to impose conditions beyond the standard conditions of the building code but if the commission so desires, we can work with the office of cannabis to identify some potential measures to that regard. >> president fung: it makes sense to me. >> so what i think it's a good discussion to have it it hasn't come up before but i think we should take a look at it and industry wide or if there are other high energy users. it would be interesting

mr. johnson and his team, with some outside help, will be able to get a remedy to this an move forward. >> reporter: hackers demanding up to 13 bit coins worth about $76,000 to unlock the city's systems. but meanwhile, city employees locked out of those systems that they rely on to conduct official business aren't able to get in. now over a week into the siege, transfer, taxes, rent payments and water bills have all come to a standstill forcing the government to suspend all late fees city wide. >> the city was infected with the very aggressive robinhood ransomware. the fbi, who is currently investigating this certain incident, has confirmed that it's a fairly now variant that's quite aggressive. technicians are trying to find out what exactly has been impacted and affected. >> reporter: hackers carry out ransomware attacks like this one by using malicious software to lock data. they then demand payment in exchange for unlocking that data. these attacks are on the rise. so far u.s. cities have been hit seven times in 2019 compared with three times in 2018 and just once in 2017. so, dana, this attack is also

hacker's hard drive. what does it mean to handle that data with the presumption that some of it is a u.s. person? mr.uebner: we will start with the collection. in terms of the collection, when you are collecting, the presumption is there will be some america's information. means is young it are making sure from a legal standpoint it is authorized. you think about how you collect the information and you think about using the least obtrusive means for collecting that information even though your target is warm. because of that potential additional u.s. person information and because it's good intelligence. do the more dangerous thing when we could do it a better way? you are also thinking about what you are collecting. scope requirement that we our information and are reasonably collecting the least amount we need to complete our mission. each time we do a collection, we have to think of it in that scope. you have all those things of that collection point. and you think now that i have the information, from that privacy and civil liberties standpoint, how sensitive is that information? what set of prot