mr. broun: the bill before us cuts a significant amount of money from programs which have targeted for strength reductions. i commend my friends, the full committee chairman, hahl rogers, and the -- hal rogers, and the subcommittee chairman, also a good friend, mr. frelinghuysen, for these cuts. i congratulate them on such. that being said, we are at a time of a real fiscal emergency. congress has allowed the sequester to happen, and we can see some of the effects of the sequester in this underlying bill. i opposed the use of the sequester from the git-go because i believe that a governmentwide across-the-board ts are not a wise way of cutting spending. i believe it's bad policy. instead of if you are loge civilian d.o.d. -- furloughing civilian d.o.d. employees and cutting our military, we ought to make targeted cuts where there's room to do so. and this amendment, mr. chairman, would do just that. it would trim just a small additional 1% or about $9.8 million, from programs relating to renewable energy and energy efficiency and put that amount towards spending reduction. the committee report for the underlying bill notes that funding for these programs prioritizes reducing gas pric