thank you. >> president tsen: yes, mr. haney. >> thank you. my question is maybe for you. not to get him up again -- but s s so, has acom done studies like this before, sort of a sense from other -- i mean, particular models that are run with this particular expectations around this development. but there was some comment around what has taken place at other marinas or what we have seen in other places. is that something that you might look at and is there related to that, is there usually some sort of in a study like this, a peer review or somebody else who might look at it and say you know, we use different sort of ways of looking at or different sort of ways of analyzing this kind of situation as a way to give feedback to your study? >> yes, a couple questions in there. about the -- i'm not sure what the comment with the oakland estuary was. we have done a lot of studies around the bay like this, so i would not say it's atypical of what we do. i don't think there is a peer review panel. internally before we submit something like this to tida, it does go through an indep

continuing colleagues, and i think supervisor yee and supervisor ronen and myself got all of us supported mr haney mr walton, miss stefani, and mr mandelman. these are the problems we like to have, and i think back to a contested election that i participated in wherein i did not win. i withdrew from the contest. when it was over, we were all friends again, moments after and to this day. i count sophie maxwell and matt gonzalez, matt won that contest, as my friends ten minutes after that election. and to this day. i want to associate myself with the comments of mr wilson and mr rosso that in ten minutes from now, and for the next many years and hopefully for the rest of our lifetimes, we all need to be friends back and work together. that is the message i want to impart. it is about issues, it is about legislation that we pass, that is -- we are legislators. we are lawmakers. that is the measurement that we should judge ourselves by. way i wanted to say that. there are many things that go into how one casts a vote in an election like this. i have known hillary ronen when she was one of the greatest

on the chart on the right, i can see that mr. haney received 100% of what was available to him, and miss johnson, 81%. this chart on the bottom shows an overview of the entire public financing program, and i can see the total amount of funds disbursed as a part of public financing was a little over 1.2 million. an important feature of public financing is the individual expenditure ceilings. this tab may look familiar to you. the charts on the tab may look familiar to you. it was featured on the policy report last month. during this election, the dashboard was updated daily, so this represented the best way to come and see what an individual candidate's expenditure ceiling was on any given day. >> chair chiu: excuse me, mr. tyler, you're saying that the individual expenditure ceiling screen was updated daily. how about the previous page on the financing? everything is updated daily as we get into the last stage of the -- >> i'm sorry. these are updated daily with -- during the 90-day election period before the election, these are update

mr. supervisor haney. >>> this looks amazing and congratulations to everyone who has done so much to develop these designs and i knee i know everybody is looking forward to being here as soon as possible. i wanted to echo some of the comments that linda richardson shared in the sense that wondering that we have an opportunity with this space if there were certain models that we look to or designs that we are replicating or sort of how some of the things that real ary are going to make this unique. with that i was wondering, i realize it's sort of a unique situation where there are residents that will be able to benefit flu through these open spaces and people that live there. but what sort of community engagement to get ideas and feedback from residents or others who in terms of what they might want and in terms of design or activities. and connected to that, there are obviously some open spaces and activities on treasure island right now. is there a sense that some of these spaces have been designed to ensure that those activities can continue with kind of an input from some of the folks wh

. >> thank you, supervisor haney. mrpresident, that includes the introduction of new business. >> thank you very much. let's move on to item 48. >> at this time, the public may address the entire board of supervisors for up to two minutes on items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board to include the december 18th, 2019 special board meeting minutes, item 49 regarding negotiations with the labor union's representing city employees, and item 50 and 51 on the adoption without committee reference. pursuant to the board's roles, director marks the board as a whole, and not to individual members of the board. if you like to display your document on the overhead projector, please state such, and remove the document when the screen it should return to live life coverage of the meeting. >> okay. let's get started. first speaker. [speaking foreign language] >> supervisors, [indiscernible] [speaking foreign language] >> i am here today ... [speaking foreign language] >> ladies and gentlemen, my name is abdullah saeed

congratulations chair haney and vice chair walton. mr clerk, please call item number 6 -- or do you take over now? >> all right. all right. thank you vice chair yee serving as chair and thank you to vice chair walton for stepping up, and to all my colleagues, i appreciate you electing me. we just have two items. item six is introduction of new items. is there any new items from the staff? all right. is there any public comment on this? seeing none. item seven, general public comment. >> commissioners, in san francisco, they own -- there are only two places where we can expand our housing, transportation, and other quality-of-life issues. it is hunter's point and it is adjacent to candlestick point and treasure island and it is all connected. if you read the documents, the earlier documents when it came to the area that i mentioned, it would say, treasure island, and then it would say at hunter's point annex. that's how the department of defense entitled these areas. in the year 2,000, when i was at the presidio with a very qualified engi

haney, would you like to make a motion class. >> yeah, i would like to move to continue this to march 5th. >> mr president, previously we had askedif supervisor haney would make a motion, which he did, and it was seconded by supervisor peskin. >> correct. i'm sorry. the motion was already made, so can we take this same house, same call? without objection, the motion to continue passes unanimously. >> mr president, there is a motion to continue the hearing open. supervisor haney? >> it was heard and filed. >> okay. right now what we just took, same house, same call, was to continue item 46 to the march 5th meeting. okay. any objection to that? motion to continue passes unanimously. colleagues, okay, is there anything else? >> in memoriam his. >> please read them. >> today's meeting will be adjourned and the memory of the following beloved individuals. on behalf of supervisor peskin for the late mr kenneth his scott or, on behalf of supervisor his fid, thomas francis murphy, and on behalf of supervisor walton, for the late ms. miss patricia banks. >> okay, that brings us to the end of our agenda. madam clerk, is there any further b

haney? [roll call] >> mr chairman you do -- term and you do have a coram. item three is a communications.aware of any. seeing then, item four. >> yes, please. >> board of directors, new or old business. >> i think if i may,

haney? [roll call] >> mr chairman you do -- term and you do have a coram. item three is a communications.not aware of any. seeing then, item

haney? [roll call] >> mr chairman you do -- term and you do have a coram. item three is a communications. i am not aware of any. seeing then, item four. >> yes, please. >> board of directors, new or old business. >> i think if i may, if this falls under old or new business, but everybody has experience experienced of the rorschach test of the governor state of the speech. i want to talk about what it means and what we are doing. there has been lots of different reporting, and the governor does support that high-speed rail system from the transit center all the way to los angeles and anaheim. what he labelled out in his state is consistent with what we said in our 2018 business plan, which is where we are already building, we want to get that into service. he prioritized putting bakersfield into service and getting that going. at the same time, and the rest of the state, what we are doing is going through all the project development steps kept getting environmental clearance, and getting shovel-ready. that is what we are doing in northern california, and that is what you're doing in southe

haney. >> chair mar: thank you. mr. clerk, please call items five and six together. >> clerk: agenda item numbers five and six are hearing and the resolution responding to the partial federal government shutdown, affirming san francisco's solidarity with federal workers and urging the mayor and city departments to assist those impacted by the shutdown. >> chair mar: thank you. at this time, i'd like to pass it off to supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair mar, and unfortunately, it seems that we have a bit of a theme in this committee hearing about the federal government and their -- their failures and some of the ways that we here in san francisco have to step up and be there for our residents in that context. i want to thank the cosponsors of the resolution that are going to be a part of this hearing conversation. supervisors ronen, walton, mar, and yee, and there are a number of folks from different deputies w departments who i'm going to be calling onto provide some insight and answer some questions

mr. spitz. any questions from members? supervisor haney? >> supervisor haney: just wanted to move the amendment. >> chair peskin: we've got to get public comment first. are there any members of the public who would like to comment, please come up. >> thank you so much. my name is gabby anderson, and i'm the social worker at hill crest elementary school, and we just wanted to offer our thanks to you for hearing and to hillary ronen's office for supporting this legislation. it was a really hard time for our school, and we're really touched that there's been so much support for remembering salina, and for public works in planting the tree in her honor. >> chair peskin: thank you. is there any other public comment? seeing none, we're very sorry for your loss. supervisor haney, would you like to move that? so moved, without objection. can we forward that to the full board with recommendation as amended? motion, moved by supervisor safai. we'll take that without objection, and we are adjourned. [gavel] >> providing excellent customer service to e

it's been a nightmare, and i'm living through it now as is commissioner haney and commissioner stefani on vanness avenue. i know mr. ramos is here in the audience from the m.t.a., listening. we've got to get a handle on this or we've got to stop appropriating money and we'll just live with funky vannesses. we've got to get a handle on this in a real way. >> chair peskin: commissioner brown? >> yes, thank you. and i agree that we have to look at other ways of helping them. i'm under siege. i have the other side of vanness, haight-ashbury, inner sunset, and it'll be geary b.r.t. so my district's under siege, and i'm always -- the amount of time that we're trying to spend to help them is -- it's overwhemumming. and one of the things with -- i know we've -- have office of economic development going in, saying that there's low interest loans for them, but i think a lot of businesses, when i talk to them, they're like, you want me to take out a loan and have another thing to pay when i'm struggling. they're nervous to do that. we've also gotten project mitigato mitigators out there to help with a construction crew, to t

haney. i want to thank samuel williams for staffing the meeting. mr. clerk, do you have any announcements? >> yes, thank you, mr. chair. please ensure you have silenced your cell phones and other electronic items. and any documents you have should be submitted to the clerk. >> chairman: thank you. mr. clerk, please call the first item. >> a hearing to discuss city policies to reduce homelessness in residential neighborhoods. >> chairman: great. thank you. so we have a somewhat tricky situation this morning, colleagues, in that we have all of us who want to participate, the members of the committee, a sponsor and co-sponsor of this hearing, and supervisor haney, who all want to participate in this. now, in addition to that, supervisors brown, peskin -- brown and peskin also would like to at least be able to make statements. i would like to make a preliminary statement, for all of us to make any statements with want to make, and either supervisor brown or peskin can be able to speak, so somebody has to get up and let them come into the room. so i'm hoping that either supervisor haney or rone

haney, and aaron peskin. the last i submit. >> thank you, supervisor mar. mr. president, that concludes the introduction of new business. >> okay. thank you, madame clerk. >> mr. president,. >> mr. president, i want to be added, i think it was an oversight. we were supposed to be on there as well what supervisor might just introduced, so for the closed charger information. >> thank you, supervisor. >> okay. now we can go to the next item. >> at this time, the board welcomes public comment for up to two minutes on items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board to include the january 15th, 2019 board meeting minutes. item 43, the closed session on existing litigation including whether or not to go into closed session, or on the possibility that the board continue this item to a future date. item 44 through 47, additionally are also welcome to be commented on during public comment. speakers using interpretation will be allowed twice the amount of time to testify. if you like to display a document on the overhead projector, please just place it under the

mr. straun. the building registry in combination way potential vacancy tax and i know supervisor haney is exciteddo the trick. are there any members of the public? >> i'll do it after public comment. >> commissioner: are there any members of the public that would like to testify on item number one. please come forward. >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is daniel bergerac and my part-time gig is representing 320 merchants in the castro upper market neighborhood. this appears to be no nonsense legislation and the laws of supply and demand work everywhere exempt for retail space in san francisco which doesn't seem to make sense to me and what also doesn't make sense to me is how nothing is better than something. we have landlords getting nothing for that property and you would think lowering that my only suggestion would be it should be based on linear square footage. and the mima should be playing more for their street front and than a small retail unit. thank you. >> commissioner: are there any other members of the public? >> teresa flandrik to support this. north beach is truly affected by