mr. hardy's driveway.what we are proposing is to put a garage which is further to the south and moved it so that maybe we can gain an extra parking space. by so doing, we are able to preserve the juniper which sits on top. we are also looking to preserve the two street trees. but the juniper and the one street a tree that was requested to be removed would not be removed. -- both the juniper and the one street tree that was requested. the highlighted portions of the car raj -- of the garage is the location we are proposing. what happens here is that we are trying to pick up the retaining wall so that it is supported by the main wall of the house. what they have right now is a been coming across to pick up the main wall of the house and then a secondary been for this portion in the front of the house. by doing this, we are not eliminating existing retaining walls at the property line. there is cost savings. there is also cost savings in the section because of the excavation, the highlighted area is the appli

in conclusion, please consider that mr. hardy removed two sidewalk trees as well as trees on his property in order to build his home. we feel that it is unfair and inconsistent to deny the same thing granted to mr. hardy. we request that you deny the repeal and reinstate the permit to remove the trees. thank you. >> the reason why is that2 been disabled and therefore when i come back home from grocery or have dinner or even for therapies sometimes, i find it it to bba it difficult job. there are many people with dogs off leash we don't need a -- there are many people dogs off leash. i need a change to improvedt;qy quality of life. here, we are facing a very important issue and life. who is more important, to have the trees there or the life according to myself. this is the only thing i would like to say and take into consideration the fact that i will plant a new tree as soon as i have the garage. mr. hardy is very unsympathetic towards my case, it is not because of the tree. i feel that my rights are violated not only as a disa

mr. hardy's driveway.what we are proposing is to put a garage which is further to the south and moved it so that maybe we can gain an extra parking space. by so doing, we are able to preserve the juniper which sits on top. we are also looking to preserve the two street trees. but the juniper and the one street a tree that was requested to be removed would not be removed. -- both the juniper and the one street tree that was requested. the highlighted portions of the car raj -- of the

mr. hardy is not want to remove the trees. we will lose the progress.e are working in the permit process. if we have to execute the new plan, we would have to reset the contract with our contractor which is a fixed price contract. the cost of commodities has gone up significantly. there will be an additional cost for us. i think there are two factors here, one this time and one is money as well as the change was the new approach would make to the front of our home. again, we ask you to approve a request to approve the two trees and approve the project. >> i would like to ask one more thing, i am a person who is disabled and normally i stay at home and now i need to start looking people walking the street. the walls come down. have we built another wall? that is not a good idea. this has the same amount of soil. the neighbor could enjoy the trees and everything. >> is there a reason why you object? >> it was a misunderstanding. when the paperwork was processed, we understand that there was two things. when we actually applied for the permit to remove the