mr. harper was pursuing. in december of 2010, they issued a privacy report to open up the discussion, and in the report, the concept of do not track. this concept has been compared by the ftc and others to the national do not call registry, already managed by the commission. but in reality, they are very different. do not call, as you know, was created because people were being bothered by unsoliciting telephone calls, particularly during the dinner hours. it's not invasive the way telephone calls are. they can ignore the ad. in my experience, none of my friends have slammed their computer on the floor because of the advertising, but i've seen many slam their phones on the floor. there are many benefited to targeting added, giving consumers information about products and services they might be interested in, and it has great value to consumers. it the advertising revenue funds, the free online content the service that consumers enjoy. but i ask you, do you concur that do not track is analogous to do not call?