mr. harper under your framework for the fourth amendment does it protect an individual's ability to control personal identifying information and to be anonymous? >> it depends on the circumstances. if you have taken steps to protect personal identifying information, absolutely yes. most of most of us share a lot of personally identifying information all the time. by entering the room we share the appearance of our face. by posting on a public forum we share identifiers. when we interact with websites we share the ip address which is essentially an identifier which can be quite reliable. so it depends on the particular factual circumstances and whether or not the person tried to restrain access to the information. there is a really interesting dimension to the license plate tracking that we now know is going on so comprehensively. and that's the license plate. i am pleasantly surprised by the emergence of this issue because i wrote something like 14 years ago and testified in congress about the privacy invasive aspects of requiring drivers, requiring license plates on cars. nobody at the tim

mr. pecori having to do with that decision. jim harper, from george washington university law school. panel, i posed three areas of e1 discussion. these are theok panels are not limited to these, but give you an idea of where we're $cwgoing. what is the current law"n regarding these issues and where do you think it's going lookingñ at the decisions that have come down today.ko corollary of that is does the current analysis under the fourth amendment reasonable expectation of privacy does it really fit this subject matter or is there another8fx way to look at it perhaps? another topic is how do we find out in our cases whether this technology has been used. you've heard from the last panel, efforts have been made by law enforcement to basically keep it secret and how dovjy we determine that it has been used. and for instance in the instance of the sting ray device, even after it was discovered it was=ñ being used, law enforcement made an effort to keep the details of how the device workcs secret. so how do you discover how these devices ar

mr. harper: i ask unanimous consent that it may be in order at any time on wednesday, april 29 2015 for the speaker to declare a recess subject to the call of the chair for the purpose of receiving a joint meeting, the prime minister of japan. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. for what purpose does the gentleman from mississippi seek recognition? mr. harper: i ask unanimous consent that when the house adjourns on tuesday april 28 rnings 2015, it adjourn to meet at 10:00 a.m. april 29, 2015. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent that i may be considered to be the first sponsor of h.r. 978 a bill represented by representative shock for the purposes of adding co-sponsors pursuant to clause 7 of rule 12. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. mr. young: i yield back. the chair will now entertain requests for one-minute speeches. for what purpose does the gentleman from minnesota seek recognition. >> permission to address the house for one minute. the house is not in ord

mr. harper? the tally is 10 ayes 16 nays. >> the amendment is defeated. mr. bennett? >> i would long to recognize bennett number one and in the spirit, the way you conducted this hearing i will withdraw the amendment but i would like to speak to it. >> i am starting to love you. >> i feel the same way. this amendment is simple. it would make clear through the new principle negotiating objective we should contribute the elimination of poverty and hunger. this would show this isn't just a way to open global commerce but an opportunity to combat global poverty. trade and foreign investment are playing an important role in global development. if we get trade right, we have the power to positively influence the global fight against poverty and hunger. in 2012, developing countries represented 60 times greater than official aid and that number is only growing. however, trade potential to combat poverty and hunger is not assured or sustainable without clear intent. to continue this momentum we need to make it clear eliminating poverty and hunger around the world are objectiv

mr. harper or anyone else, walked to the type of nose is a special with the lj and judges are not so surewith what the government is doing is actually egregious enough not just mistake of law or not an accidental administration or something like that. so any thoughts about getting that which excludes evidence? >> now i can get to the depressing other half of my introductory talk. it all depends on what the courts do with exclusionary rule to there's a lot of uncertainty as to what the standard is. until hearing in 2009 there was sort of a rule-based approach to the exclusionary rule which was evidence was discovered through some unconstitutional means there is a set of kind of rule-based doctrine, standing doctrine, inevitable discovery and that would tell you in this category of cases should it be suppression or not. if you could show to withstand and poisonous tree and the inevitable discovery you could get depression. and it introduces a suggestion that maybe now it's more of a case by case was the officer that in this case, or the police acting badly. and then davis although it enacts

mr. a harper does your framework protect the individual to control the anonymous? >> it depends on us circumstances. if you to take steps then yes. most of us share personally identifying information in all this time. by posting on a public forum. when away interact with websites we share the it address that is the identify your to be quite reliable it depends on a particular factual circumstances to restrain access to use the information of the others. there is an interesting dimension to the license plate tracking. the license plate and i am pleasantly surprised of the emergence of this issue because i wrote 14 years ago to testify in congress about the privacy invasive aspects to require a license plates on cars. at the time they thought what is this city it talking about? bed now requiring a license plate is the equivalent to marry nametag to walking in the mall for example,. so hopefully they will reopen the question to put license on the cars might be a first amendment problem because it prevents travelers to a protest anonymously. the changes are multi dimen

mr. gonzalez. top of the eighth bryce harper up. with a man on second. trying to get something to go there.rikes out looking. harper with six strikeouts in his last eight at-bats. the nats strand four tonight. dropping to 1-3 to start the season. >>> in baltimore, home opener for the orioles taking on the blue jays. not a good day for ao's starter. navarro takes it to left. two score on this double. the blue jays jump out to a 4-0 lead. norris had a rough day. eight earned running in just three innings of work. in the sixth inning baltimore just can't catch a break. chris davis at the plate. this ball deep to left. but pillar is on his horse. the orioles fall 12-5 in their home opener. >>> over in the nba the biz ards visiting brooklyn. john wall out for a second straight game resting up for the playoffs. the brook lopez show started. that's as many as the wizards had as a team in that frame. brooklyn up 17 points after the first quarter. wizards, they did have a few bright spots. beal he came to play tonight. gets the steal. nice finish there for beal. he had 24 points in the game. the fir

mr. acory thaw discusses the "riley decision." nima singh, legislative council, american civil liberties union. jim harper, senior fellow, kato institute, and orrin kerr, fred steven son research professor of law, george washington university law school. i proposed three general areas of discussion. these are -- the panels are not limited to these but to give you an idea of where we're going with this. those areas of discussion are what is the current law, fourth amendment law regarding these issues y doand where do we think it's going? and corollary to that is does the current analysis under the fourth amendment reasonable expectation of privacy does it really fit this subject matter? or is there another way to look at it perhaps? another topic is how do we find out in our cases whether this technology has been used? you've heard that efforts have been made by law enforcement to keep it secret. how do we determine that it has been used? and for instance, in the instance of the stingray device, even after it was discovered that it was being used, law enforcement made an effort to keep the details of how t

harper is here. he has six secrets he has discovered about thin people. >> he's given us one which is sleep. >> we love that. >> al is standing by across the street. mr.r center you've seen this unbelievable sculpture. it's a new addition to our plaza. it's an art exhibit called masked pentagon. it's by british artist thomas hazigo. good to see you. >> good to see you too. >> what does this represent? >> well it's five masks. different representation each face. set up almost like -- kind of like a room like a house of cards. and so the idea is you see the mask from outside and you can kind of make sense of the face. and then you get to go inside and look back through the city from out of the piece. to the people outside they're seeing the people inside. the people inside. >> and then your daughter also helped you. >> yeah. she actually ran around this one. the clay was flat on the floor in the studio. and while i wasn't looking, she climbed up and ran around the top and danced on the eye. and i decided to leave that because it's beautiful. and my son threw the clay there. kind of a family event at the studio. >> how long is it here? >> it's here for a