mr. harrell on the there were not enough specificks to consider it in terms of the bonding capacity so on and so forth. i think whether it is job creation or economic pain, if you will to consumers, based upon a rate, that is something that really can be factored in. the question for you around maybe -- this was touched on by supervisor avalos, i think. because of the reserve in hetch hetchy, there is one line item he talked about increasing in the departments in terms of their electricity costs. can you talk a little more about that. >> it is my understanding that the need to restore the hetch hetchy fund balance requires -- the option proposed to address that is a rate increase by general fund departments. that is why our report makes the link between the security payment that comes from that fund balance and some impact on the general fund. i have not tried to say that all of it gets paid by the general fund or all that increase is solely caused by this program, but absent a change in the reserve requirement around hetch hetchy, one way or the other, taking the 13.5 million out, or wha