mr. harrington was noting. there is a different variety that we can utilize under grenoble's which is the -- that we can utilize. you can -- electricity comes off those panels. there is firm renewal bills which is the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. -- renewable switches the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. there is the tradeable renewable energy credits. all the sources would qualify as renewable under the california energy commission's guidelines. and all are the types of resources that count toward rps. in terms of developing the grenoble's over time, we are envisioning we would be operating on a parallel path. the process would develop city owned resources. the term sheet for the contract is similar. the opportunity is to substitute resources. we could replace an existing resource. we also in terms of talking about, we will get to customer enrollment later. we talked about phasing in customers, adding to the program over time. we can plan for having generation be available, using a new

mr. harrington and expressed the frustration that we have with this development. >> and i will have our clerk check in with their clerk daily, and i've asked jason to contact the s.f. p.u.c. daily to find out any updates on a date. supervisor campos: colleagues, do you have any comments or questions? why don't we open this piece up to public comment. >> good afternoon yet again, commissioners. eric brooks. i'm here representing san francisco green party and local grass roots organization in our city. i would policeman phi the err of frustration but take a slightly different trajectory, as i think a lot of us as advocates, i'm sure you have seen in the media, we have our own concerns about how the s.f. p.u.c.'s program may be moving forward, what the term sheet might look like. we have for several months gone back with s.f. p.u.c. staff and s.f. p.u.c. commissioners about the specific concerns. and i think that we've reached a point in that process where since the term sheet is just sitting at the s.f. p.u.c., it's become an insillar process and it's gone forward about as well as it can go. so

mr. harrington? >> right here. >> how are you? >> i've had better days. >> do you like it in here?not at all. >> you don't? >> not at all. >> good. that means you won't come back. >> let me ask you a couple questions, then. is there any concern for other, you know, programming classes? >> we have religious programs. >> well, i can't attend any religious services. i work seven days a week at the food factory. >> you work seven days a week? >> we all do. >> you're making a lot of money. >> we don't make a penny. >> you're eating an extra sandwich. i know you're sneaking a sandwich, you guys do. you only have one sandwich? is it air-conditioned? >> where? >> in the kitchen. >> you want to talk about the equipment breakdowns we have? >> you had a breakdown? >> we have a breakdown every single day. >> that's the county for you. they can't build anything that works. >> i wouldn't hold you accountable for one single thing here. this is your talk show. >> you've got to hold me accountable for running this jail. >> right. >> and for the tent city, i know it's tough sometimes, 140 degrees in

mr. campbell? >> good afternoon, commissioners. mike campbell. i am a director here at power enterprise. continuing from where general manager harrington left off, there is a long history. general manager harrington talked about this, and i will tie it back. there is in discussion about the rates, having raids be stable over time, having a target of 51% renewable, as the ordinance said by 2017, but it was probably considered to be 10 years after the launch. the program would develop 360 megawatts of various resources to include both generation and the customer site resources, demand response, energy efficiency and. all customers would be enrolled all at the same time. the contract would be 15 years or more. there would be a single entity that would be able to provide all of the supplies and services needed, and that supplier would take on all financial risks. the city would have no financial liability whatsoever. again, ed harrington touched on this earlier, but we have gone two rfp's and have not seen a robust response. we have looked at ways to adjust the program. the first, one key change that just happened over time, and we have ta