mr. harrington was noting. there is a different variety that we can utilize under grenoble's which is the -- that we can utilize. you can -- electricity comes off those panels. there is firm renewal bills which is the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. -- renewable switches the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. there is the tradeable renewable energy credits. all the sources would qualify as renewable under the california energy commission's guidelines. and all are the types of resources that count toward rps. in terms of developing the grenoble's over time, we are envisioning we would be operating on a parallel path. the process would develop city owned resources. the term sheet for the contract is similar. the opportunity is to substitute resources. we could replace an existing resource. we also in terms of talking about, we will get to customer enrollment later. we talked about phasing in customers, adding to the program over time. we can plan for having generation be available, using a new

mr. harrington, thank you. john martin, our airport, thank you. d.e.m., of course, ann, thank you very much for being here and our human rights commission director, thank you very much, terese afor being here. it's a large city family. >> dennis, thank you. thank you very much, dennis, for being here. commissioner normandy, supervisor carmen chu, thank you. good morning, everyone. larry, good to see you, great to be out there with the new labor center. wonderful. friends, family, emily, judy, good to see you. everybody, thank you for coming. entertainment commission, of course. thank you for being here. and commissioners, human rights commission, as well. we have 11 commissioners representing eight different commissions to swear in today. and i want to, again, thank each and every one of you for both new appointments and reappointments to our wonderful commissions. this is a very, very proud day for me because we're welcoming back people who have done great jobs in our city and running our airports and our arts commissions, our civil service, our

mr. harrington and expressed the frustration that we have with this development. >> and i will have our clerk check in with their clerk daily, and i've asked jason to contact the s.f. p.u.c. daily to find out any updates on a date. supervisor campos: colleagues, do you have any comments or questions? why don't we open this piece up to public comment. >> good afternoon yet again, commissioners. eric brooks. i'm here representing san francisco green party and local grass roots organization in our city. i would policeman phi the err of frustration but take a slightly different trajectory, as i think a lot of us as advocates, i'm sure you have seen in the media, we have our own concerns about how the s.f. p.u.c.'s program may be moving forward, what the term sheet might look like. we have for several months gone back with s.f. p.u.c. staff and s.f. p.u.c. commissioners about the specific concerns. and i think that we've reached a point in that process where since the term sheet is just sitting at the s.f. p.u.c., it's become an insillar process and it's gone forward about as well as it can go. so

mr. campbell? >> good afternoon, commissioners. mike campbell. i am a director here at power enterprise. continuing from where general manager harrington left off, there is a long history. general manager harrington talked about this, and i will tie it back. there is in discussion about the rates, having raids be stable over time, having a target of 51% renewable, as the ordinance said by 2017, but it was probably considered to be 10 years after the launch. the program would develop 360 megawatts of various resources to include both generation and the customer site resources, demand response, energy efficiency and. all customers would be enrolled all at the same time. the contract would be 15 years or more. there would be a single entity that would be able to provide all of the supplies and services needed, and that supplier would take on all financial risks. the city would have no financial liability whatsoever. again, ed harrington touched on this earlier, but we have gone two rfp's and have not seen a robust response. we have looked at ways to adjust the program.

mr. doggett: i think also of the words of claudia harrington who works dealing with latino families, who writes, this is not the american dream i believe in. this is not the american dream my father believed in when he immigrated from cuba in the 1960's. i know our country is better than that regardless of political affiliation. and i know that investment in our people and their ability to earn a decent living is a worthwhile policy. . we need a policy that is more safety net than whole and i hope eventually we will work together to achieve that. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. the gentleman from kentucky. the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from kentucky. mr. davis: i thank the gentleman. i believe this should be amended for the tanf supplemental grants programs. it expired in 2011. the democrats crafted louisiana year that president obama signed into law. extending them would be spending more money to revive the program which is beyond the scope of what we are doing today and include only current tanf programs. since it was paid by $4 billion in extr